Legislature(2003 - 2004)
04/15/2003 09:05 AM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 34-REPEAL SUNSET OF NEGOTIATED REG.MAKING
BARBARA COTTING, staff to Representative Jim Holm, paraphrased
from the sponsor statement:
A process called negotiated regulation making (Neg-
Reg) was authorized in statute in SLA 1998, Ch 117.
The original bill, HB 264, has a sunset date of July
1, 2003. HB 34 repeals that sunset, thus allowing the
Neg-Reg process to continue.
Negotiated regulation making is widely supported
because it makes the regulation-writing process more
applicable to reality. It allows a team of affected,
interested parties to negotiate and submit
recommendations before the regulations are published
for public review.
Most notable successes to date have been cruise ship
regulations and charitable gaming regulations, two
extremely contentious issues that were favorably
resolved using the negotiated regulation process.
Though it does involve some up-front efforts to
assemble the negotiating team, it saves far more at
the other end of the process by eliminating lawsuits
and lengthy public appeals.
Another important advantage is that the affected
industries are involved from the beginning so the
resulting regulations are far more practical,
enforceable, and business-friendly.
Passage of HB 34 before the end of the 2003
legislative session will allow this valuable Neg-Reg
process to remain in statute.
TAPE 3-20 SIDE A
10:45 am
Examples of how this process has been successfully used include
the Department of Environmental Conservation and the Department
of Revenue with cruise ship waste disposal and charitable gaming
regulations. An advantage to this process is it eliminates
public appeals and lawsuits after the regulations have been
implemented. She noted the two zero fiscal notes.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS noted Craig Tillery was available to answer
questions.
SENATOR JOHN COWDERY asked how often this was used.
CRAIG TILLERY from the Department of Law stated the negotiated
rule making has been used twice that he's aware of. It was also
used as a model with respect to non-tank vessel legislation and
regulations.
SENATOR COWDERY asked what negative impact would result if the
law were to sunset on July 1.
MR. TILLERY replied the negative impact is the law would no
longer be available. The Administration has taken no position on
the bill. The department has reviewed it and there are no legal
problems the way it is drafted. It's a rare tool but works well
in some instances and has a place in the toolbox.
SENATOR COWDERY made a motion to move HB 34 from committee with
individual recommendations and attached fiscal note. He asked
for unanimous consent. There being no objection, it was so
ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|