Legislature(2013 - 2014)ANCH LIO Rm 220
08/22/2013 01:30 PM House LEGISLATIVE BUDGET & AUDIT
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Approval of Minutes | |
| Revised Program - Legislative (rpls) | |
| Executive Session | |
| Release of Audits | |
| Other Committee Business | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
[Contains discussion of HB 30.]
3:42:30 PM
CHAIR FAIRCLOUGH turned the committee's attention to the
Subcommittee on Performance Review, which is necessary due to
the work the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee was tasked
with as a result of HB 30. She inquired as to what the
subcommittee might do.
3:43:02 PM
MS. CURTIS explained that HB 30 requires performance reviews of
every state department over a 10-year span of time. The first
performance review is the Department of Corrections (DOC) and
it's already behind schedule. The Subcommittee on Performance
Review is tasked with approving the scope of the review, which
must occur prior to a request for proposals (RFP) for experts to
lead the review team. Therefore, some form of structure is
necessary in order to review the proposed scope, which will be
the main purpose of the subcommittee. Also, the Legislative
Budget and Audit Committee handbook must be amended in order to
establish formal procedures related to how to conduct these
reviews, including the report process. Currently, the division
is in the process of drafting - with the assistance of the prior
legislative auditor - the formal procedures for HB 30. Over the
next month, she explained, that the draft scope and procedures
need to be reviewed in order to take them up at the next meeting
in October. Upon completion of the aforementioned, the division
hopes to put out an RFP enabling the review team to be in place
and working by the beginning of the next year. She explained
that [the subcommittee] needs to have its reports drafted by
September and released in December since the reports have to be
provided to the chairs of the House and Senate Finance
Committees a week or two prior to the beginning of session. The
hope is to establish a process by which the division can perform
the work, which is all new work, and start earlier for the next
department.
3:45:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE AUSTERMAN inquired as to how Ms. Curtis
prioritizes the audits. He further inquired as to whether [the
division] is mandated by regulation or statute.
MS. CURTIS related her approach that audits and HB 30 are
separate and different matters because HB 30 reviews aren't
audits, aren't connected to standards, and won't use auditing
staff. The division has hired an individual who will lead this
process and with whom Ms. Curtis will work to draft the scope.
With regard to prioritizing, Ms. Curtis pointed out that the
statue drives and guides all of the division's work. On the
audit side, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)
that needs to be audited with an opinion out by December 15.
Therefore, the CAFR is the priority. She informed the committee
that there is a federal requirement for a single audit by the
end of March and then the sunset audits are statutorily required
to be complete. When the division has resources it performs
special audit requests, which she characterized as the lowest on
the priority list. She pointed out that HB 30 is statutorily
driven in terms of the timeline.
REPRESENTATIVE AUSTERMAN recalled a presentation by New Mexico
regarding its audit system at the recent Council of State
Governments (CSG). The New Mexico [audit system] focused more
on the savings in dollars for the state. He expressed interest
in having such a conversation at the upcoming October meeting.
Representative Austerman expressed his concern with underfunding
the Division of Audit because of the requirements in place.
3:49:35 PM
CHAIR FAIRCLOUGH appointed the following members to the
Subcommittee on Performance Review: Senator Fairclough, Senator
Bishop, Representative Hawker, Representative Herron, and
Representative Kawasaki. Upon a poll she determined the
willingness of the appointed members to the subcommittee in
attendance, and noted she had also spoken with Representative
Hawker who is willing to serve as well. She then informed the
committee that the release of documents for review will occur at
the October meeting. There was then discussion regarding the
date of the next meeting.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|