Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
02/17/2023 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB63 | |
| HB57 | |
| HB29 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 63 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 57 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 29 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 29-INSURANCE DISCRIMINATION
3:51:25 PM
CHAIR SUMNER announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 29, "Insurance Discrimination."
3:52:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS asked what the number of umbrella policies
available is.
3:52:27 PM
LORI WING-HEIER, Director, Juneau Office, Alaska Division of
Insurance, Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic
Development answered that she was unsure of the exact number but
noted that there are "not a lot."
3:52:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS asked whether the legislature should be
concerned about the potential of increased prices or reduced
insurance availability if it passed a bill requiring insurance
companies to make umbrella insurance policies available to its
members.
MS. WING-HEIER answered that because Alaska is a small market,
anything that affects insurance companies could become a
concern. In response to a follow-up question, she said that
there is not an effective way to gauge the potential impact that
the bill would have on prices or insurance companies leaving for
certain.
3:55:37 PM
CHAIR SUMNER asked whether HB 29 could potentially affect
insurance policies other than just umbrella coverage.
MS. WING-HEIR answered that her department was unable to find
any record of a complaint in the State of Alaska for any elected
official being unable to find primary homeowner's, automobile
liability, or watercraft insurance. The issue seems to arise
only when it comes to excess liability insurance. She added
that the Department of Administration, Division of Risk
Management self-insures for the executive branch and the
legislature. In response to a follow-up question, she
reiterated that no elected officials submitted a complaint that
they were unable to obtain primary insurance.
3:57:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX asked the bill sponsor if he believed the
bill could cause some insurance providers to leave the state.
3:58:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KEVIN MCCABE, Alaska State Representative, as
prime sponsor of HB 29, answered that such a possibility had
been considered. He said that he was unable to find any
insurance providers that either could or would answer the
question. He gave his opinion that if the bill passes, the most
likely scenario is that legislators will have to pay more for
umbrella policies than those who are deemed to be "lower risk,"
in a manner similar to how a person that has received multiple
traffic citations has higher insurance premiums than a person
who is a "safe" driver.
3:59:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS asked if Representative McCabe had
personally experienced denial of an umbrella insurance policy
due to his status as an elected official.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE answered that he has. In response to a
follow-up question, he said that the insurance company did not
articulate any specifics as to why his status as an elected
official caused it to deny him an umbrella policy.
4:00:55 PM
CHAIR SUMNER asked whether there is anything preventing an
Alaskan from buying an umbrella insurance policy in another
state.
MS. WING-HEIR answered that the first step in purchasing an
umbrella insurance policy is to fill out an application, which
includes listing a place of residence. The insurance broker
selling the policy would need to have a license to sell
insurance in the State of Alaska, and Alaska statutes would
apply. In response to a follow-up question, she said a physical
address is required and a U.S. Post Office box (P.O. box) would
not be accepted.
4:02:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WRIGHT asked what the consequences would be if
someone were to use a P.O. box rather than their actual physical
address for the purpose of obtaining an umbrella policy.
MS. WING-HEIR answered that such a scenario would potentially
constitute as insurance fraud.
4:03:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX commented that insurance companies are very
skeptical of fraud and will refuse to pay out a claim if fraud
is likely to have occurred.
CHAIR SUMNER replied that the issue is particularly relevant to
Alaska, as many Alaskans spend significant time out of state
during the winter months.
MS. WING-HEIER added that a physical address can be different
from a mailing address; if someone were to own property in
another state, that person could purchase an umbrella policy in
that state for that property but have the mail sent to his/her
Alaska residence without any issues.
[HB 29 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 63 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 63 |
| HB 63 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 63 |
| HB 57 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB63 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 63 |
| HB57 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 63 powerpoint.pptx |
HL&C 2/17/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 63 |
| HB0063A.PDF |
HL&C 2/17/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 63 |
| HB0057A.PDF |
HL&C 2/17/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| Testimony Response to L&C Questions.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2023 3:15:00 PM |
|
| 03.03.2023 Brian Webb Invited Testimony in House L&C for HB 57.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| 02.17.2023 Brian Webb Invited Testimony in House L&C for HB 57.pdf |
HL&C 2/17/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 57 |