Legislature(2025 - 2026)BARNES 124
03/20/2025 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB26 | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s) | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 26 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 26-STATEWIDE PUBLIC & COMMUNITY TRANSIT PLAN
8:11:23 AM
CO-CHAIR MEARS announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 26, "An Act relating to the duties of the
Department of Transportation and Public Facilities; and relating
to a statewide public and community transit plan."
8:11:44 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GENEVIEVE MINA, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor, recapped HB 50. She said the bill would broaden
the Department of Transportation & Public Facilities' (DOT&PF)
scope to be more multi-modal and specifically include public
transport in its planning responsibilities.
8:12:19 AM
CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT moved to adopt Amendment 1 to HB 26, labeled
34-LS0276\A.1, Walsh, 3/18/25, which read:
Page 3, line 8, following "operators,":
Insert "including ferry operators,"
CO-CHAIR MEARS objected for the purpose of discussion.
8:12:26 AM
CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT explained that Amendment 1 would explicitly
include ferries in the bill by inserting "including ferry
operators" after the word "operators" on page 3, line 8.
8:12:59 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX expressed opposition to naming specific
things within a general authority.
CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT stated that the ferry system is sometimes
siloed, which has not always worked to their advantage.
Including them in the bill, she said, would help break down some
of those siloes.
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX said he received a 298-page report on the
long-term plan that makes specific reference to ferries. He
added that he felt put out that "his road" is not included in
that plan and argued that all transportation should be treated
equally.
8:14:56 AM
REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE said he shared Representative Prax's
concern about the underlying bill. He cited the DOT&PF fiscal
note, which states that the bill would result in no change to
operations, funding, or designation of resources. He pointed
out that the Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS) issue is one of
funding, not planning, and argued that dollars keep being placed
into "different places," which is true of the Statewide
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) as well. He said
community transit plans are expensive, particularly in large
spread-out places, and reiterated that in many cases, the
problem is dollars, not funding, as inferenced by the fiscal
note.
8:17:21 AM
CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT shared a personal anecdote and stated that if
funding were to come, having a plan in place is critical.
8:18:29 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MINA acknowledged the concerns about calling out
one specific modality of transportation in the department's
statutory responsibilities. With regard to the broader question
of the bill's necessity, she said the bill would broaden the
conceptions of transportation away from the bias of having a car
in the effort to make the state more accessible and inclusive of
those with disabilities.
8:20:17 AM
ANDY MILLS, Legislative Liaison, Department of Transportation &
Public Facilities, confirmed that the fiscal note is fairly well
represented by Representative Ruffridge's comments. He
explained that there are many federal requirements on planning
and the inclusion of transit and other intramodalities that the
department follows, as well as consultation and coordination
with local governments and Tribal entities as outlined in U.S.
Code (USC) and the associated Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
Prior to the introduction of HB 26, he assured the committee
that DOT&PF was already engaging in area planning, modal
planning, the long-range transportation plan, and the STIP. He
said department activity is largely directed by federal funding
and reiterated that the activities outlined in the proposed
legislation are already being directed by federal requirements.
One caveat, he said, is that the department could benefit from
more specificity on where new transit facilities should be added
and urged the legislature to direct requests for increased
transit funding to the federal government.
8:24:00 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLLAND stated his support for Amendment 1 while
recognizing that it creates specific focus on AMHS in a general
plan that he hoped would continue to cover all modalities. He
opined that the ferry system is being highlighted because its
integral to public transit and tends to be overlooked.
CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT said she wanted to make sure that ferries are
part of the conversation because in discussions on community
planning and transit, they're not usually included.
CO-CHAIR MEARS removed her objection.
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX objected.
8:26:52 AM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Hall, Holland,
Himschoot, and Mears voted in favor of Amendment 1.
Representatives Prax and Ruffridge voted against it. Therefore,
Amendment 1 was adopted by a vote of 4-2.
CO-CHAIR MEARS sought final comment from the bill sponsor on HB
26, as amended.
8:27:24 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MINA stated that enshrining public transit in
statute would not only highlight DOT&PF's work on transit plans,
but also ensure that these efforts would continue to be
prioritized if leadership were to change. She emphasized the
importance of highlighting the integral nature of public
transportation to Alaskans.
CO-CHAIR MEARS sought final comment from committee members.
8:28:30 AM
REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE said he understood the need for this
conversation; nonetheless, from Mr. Mills's testimony, he
inferred that a lack of federal funding, not planning, is the
reason that things aren't getting done. He opined that HB 26
would be better suited as a resolution that highlights Alaska's
differences or requests an exception. He spoke to planning
efforts in Kenai that have fallen through because there were no
dollars attached. He said he would not object to the bill
moving forward but shared his belief that HB 26 is more of a
conversation tool and not a solution.
8:31:43 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX opined that the bill is counterproductive
because the department is driven by federal funds. He
distinguished dreaming from planning, and said planning requires
funding. In the Interior, he said there is too much talking and
not enough action in compliance with the STIP. Although he
appreciated the intent, he reiterated his belief that its
counterproductive.
8:34:27 AM
CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT said she is grateful for the bill because the
amount of federal funding is unknown. She shared her belief
that more would be asked of states going forward and Alaska
should be ready.
CO-CHAIR MEARS agreed on the importance of understanding the
state's needs.
8:35:10 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MINA noted that stakeholder engagement is
integral to ensure that plans are reflective of community needs.
She said the bill would codify stakeholder engagement with
public and community transit operators, without which,
department plans would not be as strong as they could be to
serve Alaskans.
8:36:17 AM
CO-CHAIR HIMSCHOOT moved to report HB 26, as amended, out of
committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying
fiscal notes. There being no objection, CSHB 26(CRA) moved from
the House Community and Regional Affairs Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 26 Version A Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HCRA 2/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/18/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 26 |
| HB 26 Version A.pdf |
HCRA 2/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/18/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 26 |
| HB 26 Version A Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HCRA 2/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/18/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 26 |
| HB 26 Fiscal Note - DOT - PDSP 2.21.25.pdf |
HCRA 2/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/18/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM SCRA 5/15/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB 26 Testimony — Received as of 2.25.25.pdf |
HCRA 2/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/18/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 26 |
| HB 26 Research - CFR, Title 23, Chapter I, Subchapter E, § 450.218, Subsections (a)-(f).pdf |
HCRA 2/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/18/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM SCRA 5/15/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB 26 Research - 2024 AMC Legislative Priorities.pdf |
HCRA 2/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/18/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM SCRA 5/15/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB 26 Research - 2022 DOT&PF Study - Economic Value of Public Transit in Alaska.pdf |
HCRA 2/27/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/18/2025 8:00:00 AM HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM SCRA 5/15/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB 26 AARP Alaska Letter of Support 3.04.2025.pdf |
HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 26 |
| John Springsteen RCA Resume_Redacted.pdf |
HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM |
RCA Governor's Appointees |
| Mark Johnston RCA Resume_Redacted.pdf |
HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM |
RCA Governor's Appointees |
| Steven Devries RCA Resume_Redacted.pdf |
HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM |
RCA Governor's Appointees |
| HB 26 Public Testimony Received as of 3.19.2025.pdf |
HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 26 |
| John Springsteen RCA Murkowski Letter of Support 3.12.2025.pdf |
HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM |
RCA Governor's Appointees |
| HB 26 Amendment - A.1 - Himschoot 3.18.25.pdf |
HCRA 3/20/2025 8:00:00 AM |
HB 26 |