Legislature(2025 - 2026)GRUENBERG 120
02/20/2025 03:15 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB25 | |
| HB10 | |
| HB21 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 25 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 21 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 25-DISPOSABLE FOOD SERVICE WARE
3:26:42 PM
CHAIR CARRICK announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 25, "An Act relating to disposable food
service ware; and providing for an effective date."
3:27:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ANDY JOSEPHSON, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor, discussed HB 25. He responded to an outstanding
question regarding enforcement that was brought up during the
bill's previous committee hearing [2/18/25]. He remarked on
permit requirements from the Department of Environmental
Conservation (DEC) to operate restaurants and talked about the
avenues for enforcement. He stated that DEC is currently
"short-handed", and enforcement could be somewhat complicated.
He also remarked that a testifier was available to discuss the
bill.
3:29:49 PM
CHAIR CARRICK opened public testimony on HB 25.
3:30:24 PM
PAMELA MILLER, Executive Director, Alaska Community Action on
Toxics, discussed the health implications of polystyrene. She
said that the Alaska Community Action on Toxic's strongly
support HB 25 because it is an effective measure to protect
health and reduce pollution on Alaska's land and in its water.
She said there are multiple reasons why the group supports the
legislation. The first is because the proposed bill would help
address the adverse health effects of polystyrene. She said
that it is a hazardous material that should not be used for
either food or beverage containers. She said that research
indicates that it is a carcinogen, and exposure increases the
risk of certain cancers. She said that it can also damage white
blood cells, the liver, nervous systems, distort vision and
hearing, cause memory loss, and cause slower reaction times. In
short, she said, it is a neurotoxin and should be avoided as a
food packaging material. She stated that styrene can leak from
packaging into the food, and this was especially pronounced when
styrene encounters a hot item or fatty lipid rich content. She
gave an example of a Styrofoam coffee cup filled with creamer
and how leeching would occur.
MS. MILLER said that an additional point of concern was the
environmental persistence of polystyrene. She remarked that
these products do not degrade. She said once in the
environment; polystyrene breaks down into microplastics and
spreads easily due to its light weight. She said that it can be
ingested by wildlife and causes a host of issues. She said that
in landfills, polystyrene continues to release chemicals into
the environment, and this can be especially problematic in rural
Alaska where landfill controls are not in place. She said that
when burned, polystyrene releases harmful chemicals into the
air.
MS. MILLER also said that this product cannot be recycled. She
said the health implications of its chemical composition are a
major reason why this is the case. She said that chemical
recycling, a process that converts plastics into fuel was a
problem-ridden process that simply generates hazards in a
different fashion. She said that the only chemical recycling
facility in the U.S. was closed due to problems. She said that
as of June 2024, 11 states and 250 cities/counties have banned
or placed restrictions on polystyrene. She said that McDonalds
banned polystyrene foam in 1990. She said there are widely
available and affordable substitutes to accommodate alternative
choices. She said that Green Alaska Solutions is an Alaska-
based business that provides such alternatives to Alaska
businesses. She said that customers appreciate safer
alternatives and are creating a demand for alternatives. She
urged committee support for the bill because it is an important
step in addressing the plastic crisis.
3:39:13 PM
DYANI CHAPMAN, State Director, Alaska Environment, testified in
support of HB 25. She said that plastic pollution is a massive
problem and if society continues its current trajectory, then
there will be more plastic than fish in the ocean by 2050. She
said that plastic pollution is on Alaska beaches, the streets
and even in the water. She remarked that in 2023, Alaska
Environment tested 39 different water sources in Southcentral
Alaska and 100 percent of testing samples were contaminated with
microplastics. She remarked that this included Anchorage tap
water. She said that similar studies around the state have
yielded similar results. She said that wildlife often mistakes
plastics for food, which can have damaging impacts on their
health. In both humans and wildlife alike, she said,
microplastics have been linked to health ailments such as
fertility issues, cancers, dementia, and other ailments. She
said that several steps are needed to address the plastic
pollution problem, and that polystyrene is among the "gnarliest"
of plastics due to its breakdown, transportability and
composition of the chemical styrene, a toxic chemical. She
remarked that she was delighted to hear that many of the
restaurants in Representative Vance's district had made a
transition away from Styrofoam and said that it demonstrates
that moving away from this product is possible. She said
however, that polystyrene is still commonplace in the Anchorage
area. In conclusion she said that nothing that is used for mere
minutes should compromise environmental health for hundreds of
years.
3:41:47 PM
LINDSAY STOVALL, American Chemistry Council, Inc., testified in
opposition to HB 25. She said that the council believes that HB
25 takes the wrong approach to plastic mitigation and the
broader impacts should be considered. She stated that
compostable alternatives only degrade in a controlled composting
environment, and they will ultimately end up in a landfill. She
said that HB 25 favors one material over the other. She said
that without a commercial composting facility, the alternative
materials will ultimately end up in a landfill. She also said
that styrene is a clear colorless liquid used to make durable
products, and it is processed to make polystyrene, and it is a
different product. Once converted she said that most styrene
becomes inert. She claimed that low levels of styrene do not
amount to a level that warrant concern as a carcinogen. She
remarked that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) claimed
that these products were safe and met current regulatory
standards.
3:45:41 PM
BRITTNEY ROBINS, Assembly Member, City of Wrangell testified in
support of HB 25. She remarked that she is incredibly
passionate about the health and well-being of her community and
planet. She remarked that out of the six eateries in Wrangell
only two currently use polystyrene products for take-out. She
remarked that she was the sous-chef and manager at one of the
cafs and when the company was thinking about how to provide
food for people, they avoided polystyrene due to the easily
found information regarding its toxicity. She said that
initially they had used plastic soup cups but given the
inability to recycle on the island the café later moved to
compostable bowls. She said that while the previous testifier
said that commercial composting would be required for these
products, the City of Wrangell had a garden that could handle
composting duties. She said that the cost to change to
compostable bowls did not indicate any need to change prices at
the café.
3:48:36 PM
CHAIR CARRICK, after ascertaining there was no one else who
wished to testify, closed public testimony on HB 25.
3:48:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE said that one of the struggles with the
proposed bill is the "price point" to change food wares. He
said previously he had helped put together a small hot dog
business and the difference between a white paper bag and a
brown paper bag was about 1.5 cents and it was enough to impact
profit margins because of competition amongst other similar
businesses. He asked about the price differentials when the
café changed food ware from polystyrene to compostable products.
MS. ROBBINS responded that the café started with biodegradable
products from the beginning. She said that getting products
that could be composted locally was a focus due to the lack of
recycling infrastructure on Wrangell Island. She said that when
pricing out certain products from plastic to compostable the
price difference came down to pennies and did not warrant a
price change on the menu. She said that Wrangell is small and
there were no competing businesses with the same service and
design.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE said that an issue amongst competing
businesses is that a couple pennies can make a huge difference.
He wondered whether there was a way to encourage compostables to
be cheaper. He asked whether a multi-pronged approach, perhaps
a credit could be issued for using compostables.
MS. ROBBINS responded that there are a lot more products
available. She said that some of these alternatives are
available on Amazon. She said that paper is safer than
polystyrene. She remarked that she understood that additional
pennies can amount to higher costs but affirmed that the well-
being of the community was important.
3:52:57 PM
CHAIR CARRICK after ascertaining that there were no additional
questions, set an amendment deadline and announced that HB 25
was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 10 Written Testimony 2-13-25.pdf |
HSTA 2/20/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 10 |
| CSHB21 STA Fiscal Note OOG-DOE-2-14-25.pdf |
HSTA 2/20/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 21 |
| HB 21 Written Testimony 2-13-25 (2).pdf |
HSTA 2/20/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 21 |
| HB 21 Support LTR League of Women Voters 2-9-25.pdf |
HSTA 2/20/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 21 |
| HB 25 Support LTR Oceana 2-19-25.pdf |
HSTA 2/20/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 25 |
| HB 25 Oppose LTR Plastics Industry Association 2-20-25.pdf |
HSTA 2/20/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 25 |
| HB 25 Written Testimony 2-20-25.pdf |
HSTA 2/20/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 25 |