Legislature(2009 - 2010)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
04/08/2010 09:00 AM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB225 | |
| HB24 | |
| HB251 | |
| HB225 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 225 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 251 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | HB 24 | ||
HB 24-PROCUREMENT PREFERENCE FOR VETERANS
9:34:32 AM
CHAIR MENARD said the next order of business to come before the
committee would be HB 24. [CSHB 24(MLV) was before the
committee.]
MS. KINEMAN said HB 24 sets out a 5 percent preference for
Alaska veterans up to $5,000. Most procurements would be under
$100,000 so the $5,000 limit would rarely be applied. Statute
currently contains several other preferences and the sponsor
believes that veterans need to be taken care of by giving them a
push into starting their own businesses.
9:37:04 AM
VERN JONES, chief procurement officer, said he certainly is not
opposed to HB 24. However, HB 24 does nothing to solve the
problems with the procurement code, but adds yet another
preference. That makes a total of 11 or 13 preferences. HB 24
will not be difficult or expensive to implement but HB 225
attempted to streamline and solve practical problems.
CHAIR MENARD said the committee recognizes that Mr. Jones is in
a big dilemma but more work and time is needed.
SENATOR MEYER said a more comprehensive approach could take
place over the interim working with the state Chamber of
Commerce and businesses. He thinks the procurement code can be
made less confusing, lawsuits might be eliminated and numerous
groups will not need to be excluded. He recognized that HB 24
does not solve any problems.
SENATOR PASKVAN said he understands that something that appears
to make sense, as applied, is actually anti-competitive.
9:41:34 AM
He said HB 24 is easy to support but a global analysis of our
procurement code is needed to ensure a competitive process,
based on objective standards, and to track spending in each
preference category.
CHAIR MENARD commented that the state's lack of electronic
tracking is disappointing. She told Mr. Jones the committee is
not against revamping the procurement code.
SENATOR FRENCH thanked Mr. Jones for providing him with examples
of how the offerors preference works. That information made it
clear that something the offerors preference is resulting in the
state spending millions of dollars for projects with only a
tenuous connection to Alaskan employees and companies.
CHAIR MENARD said we are looking for a streamlined tracking
system and what to do with the offerors preference.
9:44:01 AM
CHAIR MENARD closed public testimony.
SENATOR MEYER moved to report HB 24, [26-LS0135\S], from
committee with individual recommendations and accompanying
fiscal notes.
CHAIR MENARD announced that without objection CSHB 24(MLV) moved
from the Senate State Affairs Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|