Legislature(2003 - 2004)
04/22/2003 10:06 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 23(JUD)
"An Act relating to court-ordered restitution and compensation
following a criminal conviction."
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Co-chair Wilken explained that this bill pertains to restitution
for crime victims and specifies that, "the court may value
volunteer labor when considering restitution for crimes against a
non-profit corporation."
REPRESENTATIVE BRUCE WEYHRAUCH, the bill's sponsor, informed that
this legislation was introduced in response to a Court of Appeals
ruling that overturned an awarded restitution from a convicted
defendant to a non-profit entity for volunteer labor that was
required to audit the financial records of the organization. He
shared that in this case, Demers v. State, 42 P.3d.1 (Alaska
App.2002), the Court ruled that the Legislature did not intend for
the affected legislative statutes to be read "so broadly" as to
allow non-profits to recover this kind of a value. Furthermore, he
disclosed, that while the Supreme Court did not rule on the case,
two Supreme Court justices requested further interpretation
regarding the restitution statute.
Representative Weyhrauch pointed out that this bill would allow a
non-profit, which is the victim of a crime, "to recover for the
value of goods provided by volunteers if it was necessary to
alleviate or mitigate the affects of the defendant's crime." He
stressed that in order to gain support for this legislation from
the Administration, the Court System, and other concerned entities,
"the victim" in the bill is identified as the non-profit
organization rather than the individual volunteers who provide
labor to support the non-profit's position in the proceedings.
Co-Chair Green asked for verification that this legislation would
not allow such things as a special interest litigant "in any form
to be the recipient of the good faith" award to a non-profit entity
"that's been violated or offended."
Representative Weyhrauch responded that, "there is absolutely no
intent in this bill, in the criminal context, to provide that kind
of benefit to any non-profit in any other form." He stated that
this issue has been widely discussed "to ensure that that is not
the intent whatsoever."
Senator Taylor contended that this legislation is limited to
criminal rather than civil activity. He expounded that "it should
not be construed" that the Legislature intends "that similar
actions that take place in a civil matter where a civil judgment
might be brought, that as part of that judgment, a non-profit be
applying for fees or costs incurred by volunteers in prosecuting
their civil judgment." He stressed that the intent of this
"narrowly drafted" legislation is to not affect anything other than
criminal activity.
Representative Weyhrauch concurred.
Co-chair Wilken thanked the Committee for placing the clear intent
of this legislation on the record.
Senator Taylor moved to report the bill from Committee with
individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal note.
There being no objection, CS HB 23(JUD) was REPORTED from Committee
with zero fiscal note #2 from the Department of Administration.
AT EASE 10:31 AM / 10:32 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|