Legislature(1995 - 1996)
02/07/1995 03:03 PM House HES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HHESS - 02/07/95
Number 676
HB 23: REFERRALS INVOLVING DENTAL SERVICES
REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS, sponsor of HB 23, stated that this bill was
a repeat of a bill that passed out of the HESS Committee and
through the House last year. He read a sponsor statement into the
record:
HB 23 will prohibit the receipt of compensation by a
dentist for referring a person to another dentist or
dental practice. The American Dental Association Code of
Ethics forbids dentists from profiting from referrals.
This legislation codified the ethical concern relating to
referrals.
In Section 2, the receipt of compensation by a person or
advertisement referring a dental service, is prohibited
unless the compensation of referral is disclosed at the
time of referral. This legislation will help ensure that
patients are being referred to a dentist or dental
practice as a result of their quality service.
The Alaska Dental Society has had several breeches of
their ethics code and their board has requested this
legislation. I feel this is an appropriate legislative
function of the Board of Dental Examiners under AS
08.36.315.
Number 784
REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS said that the Alaska Board of Dental Examiners
has a number of issues that relate to what the board shall act on.
This bill simply adds another section under their jurisdiction. As
indicated, this bill has been introduced by request of the Dental
Society and is a result of breaches in their national code of
ethics. Because of those breaches and technology that has been
advanced over the last few years, it is quite timely to have this
legislation added to the actions of the board.
Number 849
DR. DAN PITTS, Dentist, testified via teleconference from Soldotna.
He said that the Dental Society was receiving complaints from the
public, and this legislation is a result of those complaints. The
complaints were the result of members of the public calling dental
referral services located in the yellow pages. Such a business
will get a toll-free number or telephone number which is remoted to
another town or city out of state. A large ad is placed in the
telephone book which identifies the company as a dental referral
service for Alaska. The referral service then solicits business to
perhaps three dentists who want to advertise and receive referrals.
The dentists are charged a fee, and if a patient calls the referral
service and requests an orthodontist, that patient may simply be
sent to a dentist and not an orthodontist.
MR. PITTS said these referral services mislead people with their
advertising. It appears they are a service which is run by
organized dentistry when, in fact, the service is just a for-profit
operation.
Number 968
REPRESENTATIVE BRICE asked if the names of the dentists who violate
the code of ethics are made public information. Dr. Pitts answered
that the names are not publicized.
CO-CHAIR BUNDE asked Dr. Pitts if he felt this legislation would be
restrictive of advertisement and good business principles?
DR. PITTS answered that the legislation ensures that the referral
service must say, in their advertisements, that the dentists they
refer pay for this service. If this information is disclosed,
advertising is in no way limited. The disclosure of this
information and advertising in general is fully ethical nationwide.
Number 1075
CO-CHAIR BUNDE asked if the bill would preclude the current system,
or referrals, or would it simply provide for a disclaimer that the
referrals are a service purchased by the dentist. Dr. Pitts said
that the latter was true. He continued that in dentistry, it is
unethical to refer a patient to another dentist and then receive a
kickback for that referral. This is called fee-splitting and is
also illegal in dentistry statutes. HB 23 would not effect their
system of referrals. Most dentists will refer patients to a
specialist they feel is the best for the job.
CO-CHAIR TOOHEY commented that no matter what the name, a kickback
is still a kickback.
Number 1166
REPRESENTATIVE BRICE moved that HB 23 be passed from committee with
the accompanying fiscal notes and individual recommendations.
There being no objection, CO-CHAIR BUNDE stated that the bill was
passed.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|