Legislature(2025 - 2026)ADAMS 519
04/09/2025 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB23 | |
| HB10 | |
| HB73 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 23 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 73 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 23
"An Act relating to the definition of 'employer' for
the purposes of the State Commission for Human
Rights."
1:37:23 PM
Co-Chair Josephson briefly reviewed HB 23. He noted that
the bill had a prior hearing in committee on March 27,
2025. He communicated that in current law the Alaska State
Commission on Human Rights (ASCHR) employee protection did
not extend to employees of Alaska's many nonprofit
organizations and under the legislation nonprofits would be
subject to the jurisdiction of the commission. The bill
could impact the lives of 40,000 Alaskans. The bill also
renamed the commission to the Alaska State Commission for
Civil Rights, requiring that commissioners can only be
removed for just cause, and changed the date and method of
delivery for the commission's annual report. He responded
to a prior question by Representative Bynum who offered a
hypothetical scenario about an all-boys school and whether
they would be required to employ women on the staff. He
related that he sought a legal opinion from the ASCHR (copy
on file) that cited the existence of a Bona Fide
Occupational Qualification (BFOQ). He explained that it was
a body of law from 1965 that exempted employment
discrimination on the basis of sex, "when the reasonable
demands of the position do not require distinction on the
basis of? sex" as stated in the statute. He noted that the
memo exemplified jobs such as; prison guards, orderlies,
nurses, etc. He encouraged members to read the memo. There
were instances where there could be lawful discrimination
based on the "essence of the employment."
1:40:29 PM
Co-Chair Foster moved to hearing public testimony.
[Secretary Note: Although not explicitly stated, public
testimony was opened.]
DORENE LORENZE, CHAIRMAN, ALASKA STATE COMMISSION ON HUMAN
RIGHTS, provided public testimony. She explained that the
desire to change the commission's name from civil rights to
human rights was due to confusion over what the commission
was empowered to act on. She spoke to the date change of
the annual report to November instead of January each year
and the change to electronic transmission, which was due to
expediency and cost effectiveness. She noted that changing
to the word employer covered non-profits offering more
employees protection under the commission. She agreed with
the BFOQ exclusion. She addressed the cause for the
termination change. She relayed that everyone on the
commission had been appointed by the same governor. She
believed that it was fair for an appointee who was removed
from the position to have the opportunity to inquire about
the reason for the dismissal. She relayed a story from
personal experience relating to being a journalist in
Pakistan. She determined that a newly elected governor
could dismiss everyone on the commission and reappoint
their political cronies to go after perceived political
enemies or find favoritism for their political friends. In
the ensuing time that it took the legislature to approve
the new appointees determining who would remain or leave
the committee, "there could be a lot of havoc," which
should be avoided. She highlighted that the changes did not
cost anything, and it would allow ASCHR to bring in more
federal contracts for the non-profit status resulting in
increased revenue and decreased financial dependence on the
state.
1:44:19 PM
Co-Chair Foster CLOSED public testimony.
He indicated that amendments for HB 23 were due April 15,
2025, at 5:00pm.
HB 23 was HEARD and HELD in committee for future
consideration.
1:45:16 PM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB073 Bill Summary version A, 2.5.25.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 73 |
| HB073 Presenter List Version A, 2.5.25.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 73 |
| HB073 Presentation Version A, 2.5.25.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 73 |
| HB073 Sectional Analysis Version A, 2.5.25.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 73 |
| HB073 Transmittal Letter Version A, 1.27.25.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 73 |
| HB 23 ASCHR BFOQ memo FINAL 4.8.25.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 23 |
| HB 23 ASCHR BFOQ memo FINAL 4.8.25.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 23 |
| HB 73 CDSE Complex Care Res Homes 040825.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 73 |
| HB 73 Responses to HFIN 4.10.25.Final.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 73 |
| HB 73 Public Testimony Rec'd by 041525.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 73 |