Legislature(2013 - 2014)HOUSE FINANCE 519
02/12/2013 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB30 | |
| HB26 | |
| HB22 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 22 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 26 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 30 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 22
"An Act extending the termination date of the Board of
Marine Pilots; and providing for an effective date."
2:33:15 PM
ANNA LATHAM, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE KURT OLSON, discussed
that HB 22 would extend the termination date of the Board
of Marine Pilots (BMP) to June 30, 2019. She stated that in
accordance with AS Titles 24 and 44 the board was set to
expire on June 30, 2013. She relayed that the Legislative
Budget and Audit Committee had determined that the board
should be extended because its activities demonstrated a
public need and it operated in an efficient manner. She
stated that regulating and licensing qualified marine
pilots benefited the public's safety and welfare and
protected the marine environment. She explained that HB 22
had been pre-filed with an estimated extension date of June
30, 2018. She furthered that after reviewing the audit
Representative Olson had requested a CS to align the
termination date with the date suggested in the audit.
Vice-Chair Neuman MOVED to ADOPT the Labor and Commerce
Committee CS. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Representative Thompson referred to a Division of
Legislative Audit document (copy on file) and read its
recommendation: "While the board has successfully resolved
many of the issues identified in the prior sunset audit,
current analysis of BMP operational activities showed
administrative deficiencies regarding public meeting
notifications, licensing documentation, and oversight of
the pilot associations' drug and alcohol programs." He
wondered whether measures had been taken to rectify the
issues.
Ms. Latham replied that at the time of the audit in
November 2011 the marine pilot coordinator who oversees the
mentioned issues had been in his position for under one
year; he had been unaware of the operational deficiencies
noted in the audit. Subsequently, the board was developing
a desk manual and written procedure to codify needed
primary functions. She detailed that the coordinator was
developing appropriate documentation and checklists to
ensure that an adequate oversight process was in place.
2:37:02 PM
Co-Chair Stoltze asked about the length of the board's
prior sunset extension. Ms. Latham responded that the board
had been extended in 2007.
Co-Chair Stoltze asked Mr. Habegar for any comments on the
audit conclusions. Mr. Habegar answered that the previous
marine pilot coordinator had departed from the position
with little notice; it had put the board in a bind and
subsequently items had been noted in the audit that
occurred while the new coordinator had been in training. He
believed the recommendation was appropriate. As a result,
the board was implementing administrative backstops. For
example, one of the issues involved providing ample public
notice for board meetings.
Co-Chair Stoltze asked whether was any challenge getting
board members together. Mr. Habegar replied that the only
challenge had to do with meeting during the height of the
summer maritime season when special issues arose (e.g.
investigative issues requiring board input). He
communicated that teleconferencing normally solved the
issue.
Co-Chair Stoltze wondered if Alaska's entry into Arctic
waters and the role of marine pilots had been a board
discussion point. Mr. Habegar affirmed that the board had
discussed Arctic access, but he had not seen any final
conclusions.
2:40:13 PM
Representative Munoz asked for an explanation of yacht fees
that appeared in the revenues and expenditures budget
breakdown from 2007 to 2012. Mr. Habegar replied that
foreign pleasure crafts of a certain tonnage or length were
statutorily required to have a pilot. A waiver was
possible, but certain fees payable to the state were
required.
Representative Munoz asked if the yacht fees were
applicable to vessels of a certain size. Mr. Habegar
believed the requirement applied to foreign pleasure craft
vessels between 75 feet and 150 feet.
Representative Munoz asked for verification that the fee
structure was biennial. Mr. Habegar answered in the
affirmative. He noted that all of the state's professional
licensing programs were biennial.
Representative Munoz asked for the fee amount. Mr. Habegar
replied that the biennial pilot fee was $2,500 and the ship
agent fee was $800.
Representative Gara asked what percentage of marine pilots
were Alaskans. Mr. Habegar responded that he would follow
up on the question.
Representative Gara observed that the board oversaw
trainings and approved training programs for marine pilots.
He wondered if the board had considered doing anything that
would increase the number of Alaskan pilots. Mr. Habegar
was not aware of any board action that would require Alaska
hire of pilots.
Representative Gara noted that Alaska hire would probably
be illegal. He surmised the training function would be the
only avenue to explore that could increase the number of
Alaskan pilots; he asked for the department to follow up
with the board on the issue. He requested the percentage of
Alaskan and non-Alaskan marine pilots. He would like to see
the positions filled with more Alaskans, given that the
jobs were good and high paying.
Co-Chair Stoltze remarked that it would also be good to
know how many marine pilots were Alaskans who had moved
out-of-state.
2:44:49 PM
DAVID ARTZT, CAPTAIN, ALASKA MARINE PILOTS, DUTCH HARBOR
(via teleconference), described his marine pilot service
region. He was happy to answer any questions.
Co-Chair Stoltze asked about Alaska's entry into Arctic
waters and the role of marine pilots in safety issues. He
wondered about federal government requirement. Mr. Artzt
replied that currently statutes required state-licensed
pilots onboard specific vessels within the state's
boundaries (typically within three miles of the coastline).
Federal waters were overseen by the U.S. Coast Guard. He
stated that any activity within state water boundaries fell
under current regulations requiring pilots on vessels.
2:47:17 PM
Representative Edgmon referred to the Northern Waters Task-
Force that had provided its report to the legislature the
prior year. He noted that marine pilots had not been
included in the final report; however, members had been
supportive of marine pilots' involvement in areas like the
Arctic.
PAUL FUHS, LOBBYIST, SOUTHWEST ALASKA PILOTS ASSOCIATION
(via teleconference), voiced support for the bill.
Co-Chair Stoltze CLOSED public testimony. He asked if there
were any amendments.
Representative Costello pointed out that the first line on
page 2 of the DCCED fiscal note should be corrected to read
June 30, 2019 instead of 2018. The fiscal note included
receipt services in the annual amount of $151,200 for FY 14
through FY 19 and one full-time position.
2:50:49 PM
Vice-Chair Neuman MOVED to REPORT CSHB 22(L&C) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CSHB 22(L&C) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with one new fiscal impact note from the
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development.
Co-Chair Stoltze discussed the schedule for the following
day.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB22 Supporting Documents-Audit Summary.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB22 Supporting Documents-Audit 08-20076-13.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB 22 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB 26 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB26 Audit Report Digest.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB22 Supporting Documents.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB26 Audit Public Accountantcy.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB 30FN.3-Leg Audit-2-11-13.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| CSHB 30 Gara-1- Amendment.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 30 |