Legislature(2025 - 2026)BARNES 124
02/14/2025 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB34 | |
| HB20 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 34 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 20 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HB 20-PROHIBIT FEES FOR PAPER DOCUMENTS
3:37:26 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 20, "An Act relating to fees for paper
documents; and relating to unfair trade practices."
3:37:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAN SADDLER, Alaska State Legislature, as prime
sponsor, presented HB 20. He began that, historically, utility,
gas, or insurance bills were typically bills paid via mail with
a paper check. He continued that, with the advent of the
Internet, many transactions have been made online. He described
some advantages of online payment: automation, efficiency,
decreased costs, and increased profit margins.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER continued that many businesses are
essentially requiring transactions to be done online or pay a
fee, which can be variable. He provided an example, noting that
it is common to pay a few hundred dollars annually in fees. He
asserted that older individuals, who are less likely to conduct
online transactions and more likely to be on fixed incomes, are
disproportionately affected by paper fees. Further, he noted
that Internet connectivity in Alaska is unreliable, and those
with inconsistent Internet access could face higher fees.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER stated that HB 20 would prohibit
businesses from charging customers different rates based on
paperless versus paper transaction statements. He stated that
it poses no cost to the state and no additional cost to
businesses. He concluded by asserting that HB 20 would generate
significant benefits to consumers/constituents.
3:40:42 PM
NOAH WILKINS, Intern, Representative Dan Saddler, Alaska State
Legislature, as intern to Representative Saddler, prime sponsor
of HB 20, gave the sectional analysis [included in the committee
file], which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
Section 1: Page 1, lines 3-11
Section 1 amends AS 21.36 by adding a new section, AS
21.36.525, which prohibits insurers from
charging an additional fee or different rate for
individuals who prefer to receive paper copies of
invoices,
statements and other documents.
This section does not, however, prevent an insurer
from charging a fee for providing duplicate copies of
any documents previously provided.
Section 2: Page 1, lines 12-15, & page 2, lines 1-4
Section 2 amends AS 45.45 by adding a new section, AS
45.45.940, which prohibits businesses from
charging an additional fee or a different rate for
individuals who prefer to receive paper copies of
invoices, statements and other documents.
This section does not, however, prevent a business
from charging a fee for providing duplicate copies of
any documents previously provided.
Section 2 defines "business" by the meaning given in
AS 43.70.110, which states a business is "a for
profit or nonprofit entity engaging or offering to
engage in a trade, a service, a profession, or an
activity
with the goal of receiving a financial benefit in
exchange for the provision of services, or goods or
other
property."
Section 3: Page 2, lines 5-6
Section 3 adds to the list of unlawful business acts
and practices in Title 45 to include violations of AS
45.45.940, established in Section 2 of this bill.
3:42:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARRICK asked whether there are any state
departments that charge for receiving paper documents. Further,
she asked whether state departments, should they charge for
receiving paper documents, would be covered under the proposed
legislation.
3:43:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER responded that HB 20 is narrowly focused
on businesses, and the State of Alaska does not fall under that
definition.
[HB 20 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 20 version N.pdf |
HL&C 2/14/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB 20 Sponsor Statement version N 1.31.25.pdf |
HL&C 2/14/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB 20 Sectional Analysis version N 1.31.25.pdf |
HL&C 2/14/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB 20 Supporting Document - ADN Article 2.4.25.pdf |
HL&C 2/14/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB020-DCCED-DOI-02-13-25.pdf |
HL&C 2/14/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB 34 Public Comment Received 2.14.25.pdf |
HL&C 2/14/2025 3:15:00 PM |
HB 34 |