Legislature(2005 - 2006)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/01/2005 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB25 | |
| HB66 | |
| HB67 | |
| HB20 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 25 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 20 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| HB 123 | |||
| + | HB 131 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 132 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| = | HB 66 | ||
| = | HB 67 | ||
SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 20
"An Act relating to a separate appropriation bill for
operating expenses for primary and secondary public
education and establishing a date by which the bill
must be transmitted to the governor each year; relating
to notice of nonretention for tenured teachers; and
providing for an effective date."
Representative Paul Seaton explained that SSHB 20 requires a
separate appropriation bill for operating expenses for
primary and secondary public education. The purpose of the
bill is to get early funding for education. The governor
would submit an education bill, which the legislature would
pass out by March 5. This would improve teacher morale when
pink slips have to be sent out because the school district
does not know their budget ahead of time. It would be
limited to the operating budget.
Co-Chair Meyer noted that Amendment 1 has been withdrawn.
3:50:55 PM
Representative Hawker indicated that the bill bifurcates the
budget process and may violate a fundamental constitutional
principle regarding dedicated funds. The bill creates a
situation where education is funded first.
Representative Seaton related that legislative legal found
no constitutional problems with the bill. It only sets up a
procedure and tries to do what the House did this year; get
early funding.
Representative Hawker maintained that it violates the
constitution. He opined that the legislature has the option
to deal with this issue in another way. He said he is
looking for substance in the bill. Representative Seaton
replied that the legislature does this quite a bit. He gave
examples of the Alaska Seafood Marketing Association and
Aquaculture Associations where taxes are collected with the
intent to rebate. In those instances, a procedure is set up
similar to that in the bill.
3:55:50 PM
Representative Hawker agreed in principle.
Representative Joule noted that each funding increase has
come at the very end of the session.
Representative Seaton stressed that the prevailing argument
is adequate funding versus early funding. He emphasized
that education has become a priority. He pointed out the
number of letters from school districts in support of this
legislation.
3:59:56 PM
Representative Kelly acknowledged the importance of the
issue and questioned if similar legislation has been
discussed in previous legislatures.
Representative Seaton recalled that HB 19 was discussed in
rd
the 23 Legislature. Previously, many school boards felt
they had a better chance of receiving increased funding by
coming before the legislature at the end of the session.
Many school boards have concluded that early funding is
preferred.
Representative Kelly expressed concern that the
Legislature's hands not be tied.
4:03:50 PM
EDDY JEANS, DIRECTOR, EDUCATION SUPPORT SERVICES, DEPARTMENT
OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT, testified in support of
the legislation.
Co-Chair Meyer wondered if education would receive more
funding by holding out to the end of the legislative
session.
Mr. Jeans observed that the increase to the foundation
formula must come through the student base allocation, which
occurs through statute. He acknowledged the problems
associated with notification of tenured teachers and the
purchase of supplies. He cautioned school districts from
building budgets beyond the amount allocated through
statute. Local school districts are required by law to
st
submit their budgets to local municipalities by May 1.
Representative Foster MOVED to report CSSSHB 20 (EDU) out of
Committee with the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
CSSSHB 20 (EDU) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "no
recommendation" recommendation.
Co-Chair Meyer announced that HB 131 and HB 132 would be
postponed until March 4.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|