Legislature(2021 - 2022)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/21/2022 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB19 | |
| HB127 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 127 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 19(EDC)
"An Act relating to instruction in a language other
than English; and establishing limited language
immersion teacher certificates."
9:05:26 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS, SPONSOR, relayed that it was
the third legislature to hear the bill. He asserted that
the bill spoke to a growing demand for emergent language
programs in Alaska schools, both in world languages and
Alaska Native languages. He cited that the Anchorage School
District (ASD) and the Matanuska-Susitna Borough School
District had extremely popular and successful immersion
language programs that had been nationally recognized. He
commented on the growing interest in Native language
immersion programs all over the state.
Representative Kreiss-Tomkins shared that one of the
limiting factors to starting immersion language programs
had been the inability to attract and recruit teachers that
were fluent in the target language. He summarized that a
language immersion program was an elementary language
program that immersed students while teachers taught in the
target language for a majority of the day. The students
advanced in the language year by year and the ratio between
the target language and English was reduced and by the time
the student left the program they would be fully fluent.
Representative Kreiss-Tomkins spoke to the challenge of
finding teachers. He shared that programs had been seeking
greater flexibility to attract teachers, and that there
were many unique circumstances that arose around immersion
language programs. He noted that world language immersion
programs often sought to recruit a teacher from the country
of the target language. He used the example of a teacher
from Japan that taught in Anchorage in contrast with fully
fluent Alaska Native language speakers from rural Alaska.
9:08:42 AM
Representative Kreiss-Tomkins continued his remarks. He
characterized the bill as a calibrated approach to try and
provide flexibility to school districts seeking to create
the immersion programs. The goal was to provide more tools
to attract and retain teachers to make the programs
reality, while still having state and local sideboards that
approved teachers and promulgated regulations. He mentioned
conversations with the Department of Education and Early
Development (DEED). He specified that it was the bills
intent that the department interpret dual-language
education programs in the Lower Kuskokwim School District
(LKSD) be included in the language of the bill.
Senator Hoffman asked where LKSD was located.
Representative Kreiss-Tomkins understood that LKSD was an
exemplar of Alaskan education.
Senator Hoffman relayed that LKSD stood for the Lower
Kuskokwim School District.
9:10:37 AM
Senator Olson asked if the fiscal note was all-inclusive or
if there would be liability to the school districts.
Representative Kreiss-Tomkins informed that the $6,000
fiscal note covered only the cost of regulation writing for
the department. Any costs associated with setting up an
immersion language program would be borne by the district.
Senator Olson asked if school districts were supportive of
the bill.
Representative Kreiss-Tomkins thought there was universal
support for the bill from the K-12 education community,
including urban and rural districts from across the state.
He could not recall exactly which organizations had
supported the different iterations of the legislation, but
he thought the Association of Alaska School Boards (AASB)
and the Superintendents Association had positive
orientations toward the legislation.
Senator Olson asked if he had support letters from school
districts even thought they were financial liable for the
programs.
Representative Kreiss-Tomkins answered in the affirmative
and offered to produce the list of school districts that
had taken a formal position on the legislation. He
addressed the liability question. He stated that there was
not any extraordinary liability that would be assumed by
school districts, and many were already operating immersion
language programs as they would any other program. The bill
did not change anything or create any additional exposure
or liability for school districts.
Co-Chair Bishop asked Representative Kreiss-Tompkins to
repeat the latter part of his answer.
Representative Kreiss-Tompkins reiterated that there was
nothing in the bill that would create new exposure,
liability, responsibility, or mandates for school
districts. The bill just gave districts a new option for
teacher recruitment.
Senator Wilson asked if teachers would still have to meet
all other requirements for teaching under the provisions of
the bill. He mentioned the requirements for Alaska Native
cultural education and domestic violence training that were
established for certificated teachers.
Representative Kreiss-Tompkins deferred the question to the
Department of Education and Early Development (DEED)m which
was authorized to write the regulations to figure out the
sideboards.
9:14:30 AM
SONDRA MEREDITH, ADMINISTRATOR FOR TEACHER CERTIFICATION,
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT (via
teleconference), asked Senator Wilson to repeat his
question.
Senator Wilson asked if the new type of certificate
proposed in the bill would require the same training and
professional development courses currently required of
teachers.
Ms. Meredith stated that there would be the same
requirements around mandatory training that all educators
were required to do. The bill allowed for other criteria
besides a bachelor's degree and testing requirements
currently required for regularly certified teachers. The
board would have to regulate the alternative. She discussed
the Type M certificate, which allowed for requirements to
be substituted with various factors.
Co-Chair Bishop asked if the state school board supported
the bill.
Representative Kreiss-Tompkins did not believe the Alaska
Board of Education had taken a position on the bill.
Co-Chair Bishop clarified that he asked because the board
would have to meet and approve the new type of certificate
proposed in the bill.
Representative Kreiss-Tompkins relayed that DEED
Commissioner Michael Johnson had spoken in favor of the
legislation in prior hearings. He recognized that the
commissioner was not a board member, although he worked
with the board.
Co-Chair Bishop asked how long it would take the department
to make changes if the board were to make the new
certificate proposed din the bill.
Ms. Meredith stated that considering the department's
regulatory process, it would take between six to twelve
months to regulate the certificate.
9:18:48 AM
PEGGY RANKIN, SENIOR DIRECTOR, TALENT MANAGEMENT, ANCHORAGE
SCHOOL DISTRICT (via teleconference), spoke in support of
the bill. She noted that ASD Superintendent Dr. Deena
Bishop had submitted a letter in support of the bill on
April 22, 2021, and had also testified on the matter. She
commented that education had changed in the past twenty
years and the bill proposed to provide additional
opportunities for students. She thought the bill supported
immersion programs.
9:19:57 AM
BRANDON LOCKE, DIRECTOR, WORLD LANGUAGES AND IMMERSION
PROGRAMS, ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT, spoke in support of
the bill. He echoed Ms. Rankins comments. He acknowledged
a nationwide teacher shortage and asserted that there were
even greater challenges in Alaska. He cited that there were
about 8,000 students in a world language or immersion
program in ASD. Specifically, there were 2,600 students in
K-12 immersion, including Spanish, Japanese, Russian, and
German.
Mr. Locke cited there were three ASD high school seniors
currently employed by the National Security Agency working
on Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER) working as
linguist interns. He mentioned growing programs in French,
Mandarin, and Yupik. He noted that finding teachers for the
programs was next to impossible, and the district often had
to hire from outside the country where certification
processes were very different. He cited challenges in
hiring foreign teachers. He emphasized working with
international teachers and supporting them to fill
difficult-to-fill positions in immersion programs. He did
not see the bill as a way to open the floodgates, but
rather it would be up to each school districts human
resources process to hire the most qualified people for the
positions.
9:23:05 AM
Co-Chair Bishop OPENED public testimony.
9:23:21 AM
Co-Chair Bishop CLOSED public testimony.
Co-Chair Bishop set the bill aside.
HB 19 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 127 Sectional Analysis version A 01.18.2022.pdf |
SCRA 2/3/2022 3:30:00 PM SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127 Sponsor Statement version A 01.18.2022.pdf |
SCRA 2/3/2022 3:30:00 PM SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127 Support Letter University of Alaska 3.9.2021.pdf |
HFIN 4/21/2021 1:30:00 PM SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127 Letter of Support Maniilaq 3.15.2021.pdf |
HCRA 4/15/2021 8:00:00 AM SCRA 1/27/2022 3:30:00 PM SCRA 2/3/2022 3:30:00 PM SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 127 |
| HB 19 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SEDC 1/21/2022 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 19 |
| HB 19 Explanation of Changes version B to I.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 19 |
| HB 19 Sectional Analysis ver I.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 19 |
| HB 19 Letters of Support.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 19 |
| HB 111 Supporting Document - FAQs 2.16.22.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM SL&C 3/21/2022 1:30:00 PM |
HB 111 |
| HB 111 Letters of Support Received 4.14.21.pdf |
HFIN 5/11/2021 1:30:00 PM SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 111 |
| HB 111 Supporting Document - Oral Health and Well-being in the U.S..pdf |
HL&C 3/29/2021 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 111 |
| HB 111 Supporting Document - DH Medicaid Reimbursement_At_A_Glance.pdf |
HFIN 5/11/2021 1:30:00 PM SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 111 |
| HB 111 Supporting Document - Medicaid Dashboard.pdf |
HFIN 5/11/2021 1:30:00 PM SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 111 |
| HB 111 Supporting Document - Ombudsman Press -Release, DOC Dental Report 2.2.21.pdf |
HFIN 5/11/2021 1:30:00 PM SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 111 |
| HB 111 DEN Bd - HB 111 Letter of Support - 3.16.22.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 111 |
| HB111 v. G Sectional Analysis 3.28.2022.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 111 |
| HB 111 v. G Summary of Changes 3.28.2022.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 111 |
| HB111 v. G Sponsor Statement 3.28.2022.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 111 |
| HB 168 Sectional Analysis Version O.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM SFIN 5/11/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 168 |
| HB 168 Summary of Changes Version O.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM SFIN 5/11/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 168 |
| HB 168 Sponsor Statement 4.12.2021.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 168 |
| HB 168 Testimony -- Recieved 4.19.2021.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 168 |
| HB168 DPA Response Follow up Questions--Recieved 1.28.2022.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 168 |
| HB168 DPA Follow up Medicaid-CHIP Renewal--Received 1.28.2022.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 168 |
| HB 19 4.21.2022 (S)FIN Hearing DEED Follow-Up.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 19 |
| HB 127 AMBBA - SFIN Follow-up on Projects Funded.pdf |
SFIN 4/21/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 127 |