Legislature(2005 - 2006)SENATE FINANCE 532
05/01/2005 01:00 PM Senate FINANCE
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 24 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 156 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 182 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 91 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 119 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 136 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 135 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 108 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 121 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 122 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 35 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 75 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 132 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 156 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 230 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 46 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | HB 19 | ||
| = | HB 15 | ||
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 19(FIN)
"An Act relating to pesticides and broadcast chemicals; and
providing for an effective date."
This was the second hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Co-Chair Green asked the bill's sponsor to recap the nature of the
question that arose during the Committee's first hearing on this
bill.
MIKE PAWLOWSKI, Staff to Representative Kevin Meyer, the bill's
sponsor, stated that the question pertained to the Committee's
perception that the March 18, 2005 Department of Environmental
Conservation (DEC) $221,600 fiscal note #2 that accompanied the
bill was incomplete. A new $221,600 DEC fiscal note, dated April
22, 2006 that explains how the amounts were determined has been
provided.
Co-Chair Green acknowledged. She understood that in the future, the
number of pesticide registrations would change due to such things
as attrition and users' decisions not to re-register products that
were seldom utilized.
Mr. Pawlowski affirmed that the fiscal note "assumes" there could
be "up to a 40-percent drop rate in the State" of registered
products. However, several chemical manufacturing companies argue
that a significantly lower amount of pesticides would be un-
registered than the amount projected by the Department. As a result
of utilizing the Department's projections, "the level of receipt
support services divided by the number of registered chemicals
could lead to a lower fee on the manufacturers". Therefore, "the
fiscal note is based on a worst-case scenario".
Co-Chair Green ascertained therefore, that the State would fare
better, revenue-wise, were its projections incorrect.
1:52:03 PM
Co-Chair Green ordered the bill HELD in Committee.
1:53:08 PM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|