Legislature(2003 - 2004)
02/19/2004 01:45 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 15
An Act relating to establishing the Alaska No-Call
List, a data base of residential telephone customers
who do not wish to receive telephonic solicitations;
providing that the data base be compiled at no cost to
the customers; requiring paid telephonic sellers to
purchase the data base; requiring telephonic sellers to
identify themselves; requiring telephonic solicitors
who are otherwise exempt from registration as
telephonic solicitors to file with the Department of
Law and purchase the data base; and providing for an
effective date.
REPRESENTATIVE HUGH FATE explained that last year, federal
legislation superceded HB 15. That legislation was tested
th
in the 10 District Court. The Appeals Court decision came
forward last week stating that it is "proper". The federal
legislation stands in place but the Department of Law has
found that they do not cover those subsequent areas that are
applicable to the State of Alaska. At one time, there was
to be a Governor's bill, which could close the loopholes.
To date, the Department has chosen the bill before the
Committee as the vehicle to address these concerns.
Co-Chair Harris MOVED to adopt work draft version #23-
LS0058\S, Craver, 2/17/04, as the version of the legislation
before the Committee. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
adopted.
JIM POUND, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE HUGH FATE, explained that
the bill was drafted after the federal legislation and
regulations. HB 15 was drafted to enhance that legislation
for the State of Alaska. The bill would allow the
Department of Law to be the lead agency providing them with
the enforcement authority to register telemarketers
throughout the State. The bill would eliminate some of the
harassment potential that is not in the federal legislation.
Representative Croft inquired if there had been any change
from the State Affairs version to the registration fee. Mr.
Pound stated that there would be no in State registry.
There will be no fee to the consumer but there will be to
the telemarketers.
Representative Croft asked if the telemarketer fee would be
the same as indicated in the House State Affairs version.
Mr. Pound reiterated that there is no fee to the consumer at
the federal level. The fee to the telemarketer will be
established through regulation.
Co-Chair Harris commented on the fiscal note originating
from the House State Affairs Committee. He asked if that
note would be changed with the Finance version. Mr. Pound
assumed that a new note would be zero.
Co-Chair Harris referenced note #3, FY04, and asked if the
$103 thousand dollars would be shifted to FY05. Mr. Pound
pointed out that the fiscal note from the House State
Affairs Committee was based on a "very different" piece of
legislation. It was establishing and setting up a
registration process to create a "do not call" list in the
State of Alaska. When the bill was first introduced, there
was no national registry. There is now a "National Do Not
Call" list, which Alaska participates in and is the list
that will be used.
CYNTHIA DRINKWATER, (TESTIFIED VIA TELECONFERENCE),
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW, ANCHORAGE,
advised that if the Committee adopts the House Finance
Committee substitute, the Department of Law fiscal note will
be different. The primary expenditures in the note before
the Committee were based on creating, implementing and
maintaining a separate registry. If that was not part of
the bill, the costs would be eliminated. There are
amendments to the bill requiring registration fees for
telemarketers, case lists and charitable organizations to
pay registration fees going to the general fund.
Co-Chair Harris reiterated that the Department of Law fiscal
note currently before the Committee is not accurate. Ms.
Drinkwater advised that the Department would submit a new
note as soon as the Committee adopts the committee
substitute. Co-Chair Harris noted that the committee
substitute had been adopted and asked how quickly could the
Department submit the new note. Ms. Drinkwater replied that
it would be quickly and guaranteed it would be available by
2/23/04.
Co-Chair Harris MOVED that CS HB 15 (FIN) be HELD in
Committee until the new fiscal note had arrived.
MARIE DARLIN, ALASKA ASSOCIATION OF RETIRED PERSONS, JUNEAU,
requested to testify on the bill when the new fiscal note
arrived in Committee.
CS HB 15 (FIN) was HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|