Legislature(2003 - 2004)
05/01/2003 03:35 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 14-PERMANENT FUND ALLOWABLE ABSENCES
CHAIR GARY STEVENS announced HB 14 was heard previously and the
committee was waiting for answers to several questions.
JIM POUND, staff to Representative Hugh Fate, advised the
answers were addressed in a memo that had been distributed. In
particular, the term canon law was used as an interpretation of
family so some more liberal definitions would not apply.
SENATOR GRETCHEN GUESS made reference to Tamara Cook's memo and
asked why the bill didn't simply list the family members that
would be included rather than use canon law, which is a
confusing term.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS asked Mr. Pound if doing so would present a
problem.
MR. POUND reported the term canon law was used to eliminate
wordiness.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS commented he thought using the term was
confusing and he would support an amendment.
SENATOR GUESS made a motion to adopt conceptual amendment #1 to
delete the term "canon law" and refer specifically to the family
members that are within the second degree of kinship under canon
law. This would include: mother, father, sister, brother,
grandfather, grandmother, son, daughter, grandson,
granddaughter, uncle, aunt, niece, nephew and first cousin.
There was no objection to amendment #1.
SENATOR GUESS noted the sponsor's memo said the original bill
was drafted solely to address the terminally ill and life-
threatening illness and settling an estate weren't included.
Because life threatening and terminal illnesses are both very
stressful, she questioned why he did that.
MR. POUND said the sponsor wanted to address terminal illness
and when originally drafted, the others didn't seem to be as
important.
The bill evolved from its original intent, which was to add
grandparent to the original language. Grandparent was changed to
family member and perhaps that's part of the difficulty.
SENATOR GUESS said there could be a fine line distinguishing the
two and paragraphs (6) and (7) were inconsistent.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS asked Mr. Pound if he had comments on
proposed amendment #2 that was discussed at the previous
hearing.
MR. POUND was under the impression that amendment #1 would
address proposed amendment #2 as well.
SENATOR GUESS said the issue would be guardianship and the
drafter would have to address the changes.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS noted the next committee of referral was
finance and the bill could be amended in either committee.
SENATOR GUESS commented the Finance Committee is very busy and
she would prefer amending the bill before passing it on.
SENATOR FRED DYSON noted a meeting could be called as soon as
the amendment was drafted since the 24-hour rule was in effect.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS held HB 14 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|