Legislature(2019 - 2020)SENATE FINANCE 532
05/06/2019 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB14 | |
| SB91 | |
| HB106 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 106 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 14 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 91 | TELECONFERENCED | |
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 14(FIN)
"An Act relating to assault in the first degree;
relating to harassment; relating to sex offenses;
relating to the definition of 'dangerous instrument';
providing for an aggravating factor at sentencing for
strangulation that results in unconsciousness;
relating to the duties of the prosecuting attorney;
and relating to victim notifications."
9:02:00 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof relayed that the committee had heard the
Senate version of the bill (SB 14) on May 11, 2019; and SB
14 was heard on May 4, 2019.
9:02:54 AM
JULI LUCKY, STAFF, SENATOR NATASHA VON IMHOF, spoke to the
changes in the committee substitute (CS). She discussed the
Explanation of Changes document (copy on file):
The word "ejaculate" is replaced with "semen" to
better conform to current statute and legal precedent
and that term is defined. [P3, Line 6 and new ?5: P3,
Lines 17-19]
The rest of the changes relate to granting credit
against a sentence for time spent in treatment or on
electronic monitoring (EM), which necessitates a title
change and conforming changes to the applicability
language in section 11. [New ?6 & ?7]
Current AS 12.55.027(g) allows offenders guilty of
certain serious crimes to receive limited credit for
time spent on Electronic Monitoring (EM). SCS HB 14
(FIN) prohibits credit for EM for those specified
crimes but clarifies that credit can be granted when
the defendant is on EM while participating in
residential treatment. Sex offenders are removed from
this list and cannot get credit for time spent in
treatment OR on EM. [P3, Line 21 P4, Line 4]
Further clarifies in (j) that judges will determine
whether the sentence meets the declaration of purpose
criteria listed in AS 12.55.005 before granting credit
and in (k) that time cannot be "double counted" if a
defendant was on EM while receiving treatment. [P4,
Lines 5-11].
9:05:53 AM
Ms. Lucky stated that the language in (j) and (k) was
clarifying language meant to provide direction to the
court. She relayed that a title change resolution would be
needed if the CS were adopted by the committee, as well as
applicability changes in Section 11. She added that the
adoption of the CS would change the fiscal notes.
9:07:24 AM
Co-Chair von Imhof solicited comments from the committee.
Senator Micciche understood that the bill defined
strangulation to the point of unconsciousness as a crime,
as well as other changes. He shared that he supported the
electronic monitoring language.
9:09:24 AM
Senator Hoffman directed attention to the most recent
adoption of Section K, which specified that the electronic
monitoring and treatment programs did not have to be run
simultaneously. He asked whether the intent of the bill was
to allow for the credits to be claimed simultaneously.
Ms. Lucky stated that the intent of the section was that if
a person was under electronic monitoring and in treatment
simultaneously, credit could not be given for both. She
stressed that the issue had been debated rigorously and it
had been decided that if a person had a period of
electronic monitoring while not in treatment, or vice
versa, they could request credit for what was available
under the law. She noted that some crimes did not allow for
electronic monitoring credit. She said that if the offender
was in treatment on the same day as they were under
electronic monitoring, they could not count it as two days
of credit.
9:11:29 AM
Senator Micciche reminded that the combination would be for
other crimes and not the crimes on the list of "serious
crimes" as defined in the CS. For serious crimes, credit
could only be given for time spent in treatment.
9:12:25 AM
Ms. Lucky reviewed FN 8 from the Department of
Administration, OMB Component 43. The note was
indeterminate because the Office of Public Assistance could
not speak to how many new cases it might take on in the out
years.
Ms. Lucky reviewed FN 9 from Department of Administration,
OMB Component 1631. She noted that the note was
indeterminate for the same reasons as FN 8.
Ms. Lucky reviewed a Statement of Zero Fiscal Impact, which
replaced all the individual zero fiscal notes in the
packet, these notes reflect that no changes in regulation
and/or costs will be absorbed by the departments. The
departments included the Department of Health and Social
Services, Department of Law, and Department of Public
Safety.
Ms. Lucky addressed a new fiscal note from the Judiciary,
OMB Component 768. She noted that the note was not included
in the consolidated zero notes as it was not part of the
executive branch.
Ms. Lucky addressed a new fiscal impact note from
Department of Corrections, OMB Component 1381. She relayed
that the department would address the note.
9:15:16 AM
SYLVAN ROBB, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, addressed
the new fiscal impact note from the Department of
Corrections. She noted that the fiscal note was a draft.
The changes to the note from the previously published note
related to credit for electronic monitoring. The removal of
credit for electronic monitoring would result in several
individuals spending additional time in correctional
facilities. She said that the department projected that the
change would impact 363 defendants that had previously
received credit for EM, and those individuals would spend
an additional 36.6 days in incarceration, increasing the
daily population by 35.5 inmates. She furthered that the
cost for the inmates had been calculated at the marginal
rate of $44.98 per day. She stated that after talking with
the Deputy Director of Health and Rehabilitation Services
and the Director of Probation, Parole, and Pre-Trial,
failed to result in data on how many individuals attended
residential treatment pre-trial. A projected estimate,
without actual data, was that 10 percent would receive the
credit, which would bring the projected increase to the
daily population down from 35.5 to 32.
9:18:08 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHN LINCOLN, SPONSOR, thought the CS made
the bill stronger and better, particularly with regards to
electronic monitoring. He thanked the committee for working
on the bill.
9:19:02 AM
Co-Chair Stedman was appreciative of the thanks and of the
work between the house and the senate. He noted that it was
the sponsor's birthday.
Representative Lincoln acknowledged Senator Micciche's work
on the bill. He appreciated the collaborative nature of
their working relationship.
9:20:29 AM
Senator Micciche MOVED to ADOPT proposed committee
substitute for CSHB 14, Work Draft 31-LS0182\H (Radford,
5/5/19). There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Co-Chair von Imhof noted that there were invited testifiers
online to answer questions.
9:21:31 AM
Senator Micciche offered brief a brief closing statement on
the legislation.
Senator Micciche MOVED to report SCS CSHB 14(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
SCS CSHB 14(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with one new fiscal impact from
the Department of Corrections; one new zero fiscal note
from the Alaska Judicial System; one new Statement of Zero
Fiscal Impact for the Department of Health and Social
Services, the Department of Law, and the Department of
Public Safety; and two previously published indeterminate
fiscal notes: FN 8(ADM), FN 9(ADM).
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB106 ver A Sponsor Statement 3.26 (1).pdf |
HFIN 4/1/2019 1:30:00 PM SFIN 5/6/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 106 |
| HB106 ver A Back Up Information - School Debt Spreadsheet 4.17.19.pdf |
SFIN 5/6/2019 9:00:00 AM SFIN 2/14/2020 9:00:00 AM |
HB 106 |
| SB 91 CS SB 91 (FIN) v. S work draft.pdf |
SFIN 5/6/2019 9:00:00 AM |
SB 91 |
| SB 91 CS SB 91 (FIN) v. S Explanation.pdf |
HRES 5/8/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 5/10/2019 1:00:00 PM SFIN 5/6/2019 9:00:00 AM |
SB 91 |
| HB 14 SCS CSHB 14 (FIN) v. H Statutory References.pdf |
SFIN 5/6/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 14 |
| HB 14 SCS CSHB 14 (FIN) v. H.pdf |
SFIN 5/6/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 14 |
| HB 14 SCS CSHB 14 (FIN) v. H Explanation.pdf |
SFIN 5/6/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 14 |