Legislature(2023 - 2024)GRUENBERG 120
05/05/2023 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB129 | |
| HB11 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 129 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 11 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 11-CRIME: ASSAULT IN THE PRESENCE OF A CHILD
2:06:50 PM
CHAIR VANCE announced that the final order of business would be
SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 11, "An Act establishing
the crime of assault in the presence of a child."
CHAIR VANCE opened invited testimony.
2:07:24 PM
MICHAEL SHAFFER, Office of Victims' Rights, Legislative Agencies
and Offices, gave invited testimony during the hearing on SSHB
11. He highlighted the importance of the proposed legislation
because of the impact that witnessing violence has on children
under the age of 16. He reported that when children witnesses
violence, it directly affects their brain development,
specifically the cerebral cortex. Even children as young as six
months old can be affected by violence occurring around them.
In addition to the physical impact, he acknowledged the
emotional and psychological effects of observing violence. He
discussed the importance of domestic violence intervention
programs for people capable of committing violent crimes around
children. He opined that the bill was long overdue, noting that
the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA) had the crime "on the books"
for over twenty years and consequently, it had been tested in
terms of appellate law. He acknowledged that the bill wouldn't
add much in the way of resources for law enforcement or
prosecutors; nonetheless, it would help to better protect
children across the state in situations where violence was being
committed around them.
2:13:59 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN inquired about the statistical impact of
enacting the law in the MOA.
MR. SHAFFER shared his understanding that a formal study had not
been conducted on family violence prosecutions in Anchorage. He
said the bill may not be a perfect solution; nonetheless, it's
better than doing nothing, he said, given the crime's impact on
small children.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN inferred that the municipal law had
impacted the justice system in the way of more prosecutions and
convictions. He requested data or anecdotal evidence of changed
behavior or a diminishment of violence in front of children.
MR. SHAFFER anecdotally reported that the crime made offenders
more mindful and conscious of the impact that an assault has on,
not only the person that it was perpetrated against, but the
children who witnessed it. He said many of the offenders who
completed programs ceased to reoffend.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked Mr. Skidmore to share his
perspective.
2:18:08 PM
JOHN SKIDMORE, Deputy Attorney General, Criminal Division,
Department of Law (DOL), reminded the committee that Mr. Shaffer
worked through the MOA to prosecute a crime that had been in the
municipal code since 2000. He said he was unaware of research
on the effect of the particular provision.
2:18:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER asked whether the proposed crime,
assault in the presence of a child, could be used to prosecute
an assault that occurred in a high school in front of younger
children.
MR. SKIDMORE answered yes, he believed that, theoretically, it
could allow for that prosecution. He expounded on the impact of
adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), adding that the inclusion
of ACEs would be a policy call for the legislature.
CHAIR VANCE noted that a forthcoming amendment would exclude
juveniles from the bill.
2:21:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER sought to verify that assault in the
presence of a child applied to fourth degree assault, which
included the verbal threat or fear of physical injury without
physical contact. He asked whether that was accurate.
MR. SKIDMORE said case law indicated that when placing someone
in fear, there must be fear of imminent injury. He shared, for
example, that stating the words "I'm going to kick your butt"
would not qualify as a fear assault. Alternatively, getting
ready to hit someone without making contact would qualify as a
fear assault. He confirmed that committing a fear assault in
the presence of a child would qualify [under the new statute].
2:24:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ANDY JOSEPHSON, Alaska State Legislature, prime
sponsor of SSHB 11, asked for verification that there was a
"world of juvenile justice" that most Alaskans weren't aware of.
MR. SKIDMORE answered yes.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON sought to confirm that assault in the
fourth degree applied to juveniles.
MR. SKIDMORE answered yes.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON confirmed that he and Chair Vance were
looking for a way to exclude juveniles from the crime's
applicability. He asked whether DOL had a preference as to
whether the criminal code for juveniles should be separate from
that of adults.
MR. SKIDMORE said that was a difficult question to answer,
indicating that the concept of criminalizing certain conduct for
adults but not for children involved analyses of issues related
to equal protection. He pointed out that, unlike adult criminal
prosecutions, the goal of juvenile justice was to consider the
best interest of the child.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON asked whether the committee should be
concerned about a raft of new misdemeanor charges against
children or whether the charges would be disposed of.
MR. SKIDMORE answered no, he did not believe that there would be
a raft of fourth degree assault charges filed against children.
2:30:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN inquired about the department's criteria
for making referral in a juvenile case.
MR. SKIDMORE explained that law enforcement investigated
juvenile cases in the same way as any other criminal conduct.
Law enforcement agencies then refer the cases to the Division of
Juvenile Justice (DJJ) for further evaluation. He directed the
question to DJJ.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN inquired about the process of charging a
juvenile as an adult.
MR. SKIDMORE stated that the process was dictated by statute.
He reported that when children above the age of 16 commit a
serious offense, such as an unclassified or class A felony, they
can be automatically waivered [into adult court]. He recalled
only two instances in which juveniles under the age of 16 were
waved into adult court.
2:33:45 PM
CHAIR VANCE opened public testimony on SSHB 11. After
ascertaining that no one wished to testify, she closed public
testimony and announced that the bill would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 11 - Amendment #1 (S.3).pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 11 |
| HB 11 - Amendment #2 (S.4).pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 11 |
| HB 11 - Amendment #3 (S.7).pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 11 |
| HB 11 - Amendment #4 (S.6).pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 11 |
| HB 11 - Amendment #5 (S.9).pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 11 |
| HB 11 - Amendment #6 (S.8).pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 11 |
| HB 11 - Amendment #7 (S.12).pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 11 |
| HB 11 - Amendment #8 (S.11).pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 11 |
| HB 11 - Amendment #9 (S.10).pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 11 |
| HB 129 - Amendment #1 (B.7) by Chair Vance.pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/8/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 - Amendment #2 (B.8) by Chair Vance.pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/8/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 - Amendment #3 (B.4) by Rep. Eastman.pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/8/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 - Amendment #4 (B.5) by Rep. Eastman.pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/8/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |
| HB 129 - Amendment #5 (B.3) by Rep. Eastman.pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2023 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/8/2023 1:00:00 PM |
HB 129 |