Legislature(2021 - 2022)BARNES 124
04/27/2021 08:00 AM House COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB16 | |
| HB11 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 16 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 11 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 11-DEFENSIVE DISPLAY OF FIREARM
8:45:32 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE announced that the final order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 11, "An Act relating to assault in the
third and fourth degrees; and relating to reckless
endangerment."
8:45:53 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GEORGE RAUSCHER, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor, offered the sponsor statement for HB 11, which
read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
Article 1, Section 19 of the Alaska Constitution,
among the declaration of rights enshrines the right of
Alaskans to keep and bear arms.
"A well-regulated militia being necessary to the
security of a free state, the right of the people to
keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The
individual right to keep and bear arms shall not be
denied or infringed by the State or a political
subdivision of the State."
House Bill 11 is an effort to preserve these rights,
and protect individuals acting in a manner in defense
of self, defense of a third party or defense of
property and premises, from arrest when defensively
displaying a firearm.
Current law allows for police to arrest individuals
who display a weapon defensively for third or fourth
degree assault, or for reckless endangerment. This
bill would exclude the provisions of the above
mentioned offenses against a person if the individual
displays a weapon in a defensive manner.
The bill continues to define defensive display as
follows:
? Openly wearing, carrying or possessing a
firearm
Verbally informing another person of the
possession of a firearm
? Holding a firearm in a position that does not
point the firearm directly at another person
? Displaying a firearm to dissuade a threatening
person
? Warning another person of the availability of a
firearm to dissuade a threat by the other person
House Bill 11 will protect the rights of Alaskans from
the unnecessary arrests and expense of claiming a
justification defense, when they merely displayed a
firearm, and did not act in a manner that is beyond
definition in the bill.
I urge your support for this bill to protect the
rights of Alaskans to bear arms in a defensive manner.
8:49:00 AM
JESSE LOGAN, Staff, Representative George Rauscher, Alaska State
Legislature, offered a sectional analysis for HB 11 on behalf of
Representative Rauscher, prime sponsor. The sectional analysis
read as follow [original punctuation provided]:
Section 1 Excludes defensive display of a firearm from
the violations of third degree assault.
Section 2 Excludes defensive display of a firearm from
the violations of fourth degree assault.
Section 3 Excludes defensive display of a firearm from
the violations of reckless endangerment.
Section 4 Defines defensive display of a firearm.
Section 5 Defines the applicability of the bill and
offenses to only those committed after the effective
date.
MR. LOGAN said third degree assault means to recklessly place
another person in fear of imminent serious injury by means of a
dangerous instrument; it is a Class C felony that carries a
penalty of up to five years in prison and up to a $50,000 fine.
He said fourth degree assault is a Class A misdemeanor, which
carries with it a fine of up to $10,000 and up to one year in
jail. Reckless endangerment is also a Class A misdemeanor, he
noted. He said anyone allowed carry a firearm can carry it
opened or concealed. An "open carry" can be seen by others.
Regarding concealed carry, Mr. Logan said the question before
the committee is: "How do you communicate that to a perceived
threat?" He said 19 states allow "permit-less carry" or
concealed carry; only 5 of those states have determined "how to
communicate that." He indicated that no [states] have defined
"brandishing," although there is federal code pertaining to the
term. He paraphrased the definition of "brandishing" found in
Merriam Websters Dictionary, which read as follows: "to shake
or wave (something, such as a weapon) menacingly."
MR. LOGAN directed attention to Section 4 [page 1, line 13,
through page 2, line 6], which he said offers a list of what is
included under "defensive display of a firearm." He warned that
in law, anything not included on the list "is considered to have
been excluded on purpose"; therefore, he urged the committee to
consider creating a committee substitute that would provide a
definition instead of a list.
MR. LOGAN named two scenarios: One is a person at home and the
other is a person in public; both perceive a threat. He asked,
"How do you communicate to that perceived threat that you have a
deadly weapon and you're willing to use it?" He then asked,
"Without that definition of communication, what's the purpose of
having [a] concealed weapon?"
8:52:25 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE noted that before President Joe Biden was
elected, he had talked about taking a shotgun out to his porch
and shooting a couple rounds. Representative McCabe said that
in Alaska, a person who fires a shotgun from the porch at a
person "coming at" the house would be arrested by the Alaska
State Troopers for "brandishing and scaring a person." He asked
whether HB 11 would "make that legal."
MR. LOGAN answered, "No, I don't think there's a scenario where
you fire a weapon in any direction that's going to be okay,
except for in defense of a deadly threat." He indicated that
[HB 11] "goes into the definitional of ... how do you
communicate it?"
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE remarked that if the person on the porch
announced, "I have a shotgun," then that would be considered
brandishing under Alaska law. He said the same would apply to
someone stepping outside his/her car and saying, "I have a
pistol."
8:54:14 AM
CO-CHAIR HANNAN questioned whether the bill sponsor had heard of
situations where an individual was apprehended solely for having
a weapon on the porch rather than also being a case of domestic
violence, for example, where the gun is being used by the
husband to remind the wife to behave. She explained that she is
curious whether "we are prosecuting those statements
exclusively, in isolation from ... the charge of threat."
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER replied that his office has contacted
law enforcement and is "asking for those" but has not received
the information, which he said he would provide to the committee
once received.
MR. LOGAN, regarding Co-Chair Hannan's example, said he did not
think that would be considered defensive. He said he thinks it
would be an offensive display of a weapon - a situation he said
he thinks HB 11 does not seek to address. He noted that the
bill sponsor's office had spoken with the Department of Law
(DOL) to ensure that domestic violence cases "are not [in] any
way altered with this."
CO-CHAIR HANNAN said she understands, but also understands that
no bills change what is in the Constitution of the State of
Alaska regarding the right of Alaskans to own legal weapons.
She indicated the issue is crafting the distinction between
"where's the problem?" and "what's really happening?" She said
theoretically Alaska State Troopers could be arresting
individuals for saying, "I have a gun." She said she has never
heard of that happening, and she has carried and advertised
carrying a concealed weapon and permit to carry, both of which
must be professed to law enforcement immediately upon getting
pulled over. She said she is looking for the problem, not a
theoretical problem that may take place in the future. She said
in many cases of domestic violence, the threats have not been
carried out, which is what makes so many of the cases so
challenging.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER reiterated that information would be
forthcoming from DOL.
8:58:14 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY said he knows of cases where people said,
"I've got a firearm; back off" and were arrested. He talked
about the dialogue as compared to the outcome of a court case.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER suggested that if what is acceptable and
what is not acceptable are defined, then a person does not have
to go to court to prove whether or not what he/she did was
acceptable.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY distinguished between someone using a
firearm to get someone out of the house as compared to someone
trespassing on property and the property owner telling the
trespasser he/she has a firearm. He said he has heard of cases
where "people were arrested" and yet "the perpetrator was not
the person on the porch - it's the person who's trespassing."
9:01:05 AM
MR. LOGAN said he does not have any statistics on "how many
times this happened in Alaska" but said there are thousands of
cases across the country where someone has had a concealed
weapon, showed the weapon to a person harassing them in the next
lane, and got arrested. He said "we" have guns, but asked, "How
do we dispel a threat without using it?"
9:01:52 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE said he has carried a concealed weapon for
years and has been an officer of the law. He said, "We are
always taught, if you pull your weapon, you have to use it." He
opined, "An armed society is a polite society." He said if a
person instigates verbal conflict and must pull his/her gun and
take action, then that person is at fault. He countered that
sometimes a person will "go after" a polite person, and the
polite person cannot let the offensive person know that he/she
has a weapon without risking a felony or Class A misdemeanor for
brandishing a weapon. Being able to announce the presence of a
gun to deescalate a situation may fill "a gap," he suggested.
He indicated that [HB 11] makes sense to him. He said people
might abuse it, but the proposed bill is "kind of a hole that
has been needed for many, many years."
9:04:22 AM
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE asked for distinction between verbally
informing another person of the possession of a firearm and
warning another person of the availability of a firearm to
dissuade a threat by the other person.
MR. LOGAN suggested changes may be needed to the language of the
CS and advised the language be made specific.
CO-CHAIR SCHRAGE said he thinks that how a person relates the
existence of a fire arm is important. He explained, "I think
informing someone that you have a gun may not cause the same
issues as informing someone and conveying an intent to utilize
that gun, and so I think there's some nuance to be worked out in
this bill."
[HB 11 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 4.23.2021 HB 16 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| 4.23.2021 HB16 Ver. A.PDF |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| 4.23.2021 HB 16 Sectional.pdf |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| 2021.4.27 HB 16 CS ver. B.pdf |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| 2021.4.27 HB 16 DOA Fiscal Note.pdf |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| 4.23.2021HB 11 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 11 |
| 4.23.2021 HB 11 ver A.PDF |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 11 |
| 4.23.2021 HB 11 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HCRA 4/27/2021 8:00:00 AM HCRA 4/29/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 11 |