Legislature(2025 - 2026)ADAMS 519
03/12/2025 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB53 || HB55 | |
| HB10 | |
| HB31 | |
| HB36 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 53 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 55 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 31 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 36 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 10
"An Act relating to the Board of Regents of the
University of Alaska."
3:15:49 PM
STUART RELAY, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE ASHLEY CARRICK, noted
that Representative Carrick had been called to another
meeting.
CADENCE CONNER, INTERN, REPRESENTATIVE ASHLEY CARRICK,
provided an overview of the bill. She read from prepared
remarks.
Mr. Stuart offered to review the sectional analysis.
Representative Hannan noted that the seat was a two-year
seat. She asked if full appointments were six-year terms.
Mr. Stuart answered that the Board of Regents had an eight-
year term.
Representative Hannan asked if there was a reason the
sponsor had chosen a two-year term.
Mr. Stuart answered that previous versions of the bill had
included a faculty member as a four-year seat.
3:20:17 PM
Representative Johnson asked if there would be other
hearings on the bill.
Co-Chair Foster stated it was an introductory hearing and
the bill would be held.
Representative Johnson stated there were currently 11
members and the bill would increase the board to 12. She
asked about the even or odd numbers in relation to voting .
She asked if the member would be voting member.
REPRESENTATIVE ASHLEY CARRICK, SPONSOR, answered that the
bill would require 7 members for a quorum and would require
a majority of the membership to pass a motion.
Mr. Relay replied that the bill would require 7 members for
a quorum and would require a majority of the membership to
pass a motion.
Co-Chair Foster asked for verification that none of the
seats were currently designated.
Representative Carrick answered in the affirmative, besides
the student seat, which was also designated in the
provision.
3:24:00 PM
Representative Galvin wondered whether there were 11 full
time faculty members. She also asked whether there was
support of other faculty and students for the addition.
Ms. Conner replied that there was a letter of support from
student leaders.
Representative Galvin asked if the student was a voting
member.
Representative Carrick answered that there were six
university systems with a faculty regent in other states,
and she stated that the student regent was a fully voting
member.
Representative Johnson stated she had some concern about
executive sessions.
Representative Carrick believed it was a valid concern that
had arisen in prior hearings on the legislation.
3:27:44 PM
Representative Hannan served as a student regent in the UA
system.
Representative Tomaszewski could see why the student regent
would be a two-year term. He asked about the requirements
for the other 10 existing regent positions.
Mr. Relay responded that they would follow up with the
information.
Representative Carrick replied that she did not believe
there were any other requirements. The regents were
appointed by the governor. She would follow up.
Representative Allard asked if there was currently an
honorarium member.
Representative Carrick replied in the negative.
Representative Allard asked about support from the faculty.
Ms. Conner answered that they were currently waiting on the
letter of support.
Representative Allard thought there was a problem having an
even number of board members. She asked why adding a
faculty member would be beneficial.
3:30:52 PM
Representative Carrick replied there were several impetuses
for having a faculty regent. She clarified that it was not
meant to indicate a student regent was not doing a good
job.
Representative Allard thought the student perspective was
the best. She asked if having a faculty member would be in
conflict of interest with union contracts. She thought it
was problematic and the regents needed neutral members.
Representative Carrick answered that the legislature
approved the funding for union contracts.
Representative Allard stated there would still be conflict
of interest.
Representative Carrick stated it went back to the ability
to recuse themselves from voting on motions related to
salaries and contracts.
3:33:46 PM
Representative Carrick noted that the invited testifier was
no longer online.
Representative Allard stated that faculty alliance already
existed. She asked if there was already a board advocating
for the faculty.
Representative Carrick answered that it was the advocacy
group.
Representative Allard stated there was a faculty alliance
that already existed. She did not think it was necessary to
add another regent.
Representative Tomaszewski asked who made up the list of
nominees forwarded to the governor.
Representative Carrick answered that the student regent had
to fill out an application and had to have support from
their student government.
3:36:57 PM
Representative Stapp asked about the equal number of
members.
Representative Carrick noted they could talk offline.
Co-Chair Foster asked for a review of the fiscal note.
CHAD HUTCHISON, DIRECTOR, STATE RELATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF
ALASKA (via teleconference), reviewed the OMB component 730
fiscal note that travel costs averaged about $1,000 per
member.
Representative Tomaszewski assumed the Board of Regents
currently had a $44,000 appropriation for travel.
Mr. Hutchison replied that the current amount was
approximately $36,000, and that typically only nine members
traveled.
Co-Chair Foster asked Representative Carrick for any
closing comments.
Representative Carrick thanked the committee.
HB 10 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 53 CS v.I HCS1 Agency Summary.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |
| HB 53 CS v.I HCS1 Agency Summary - UGF 031225.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |
| HB 53 CS Workdraft v.I 031125.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |
| HB 53 v. I HCS1 Sup Transaction Detail.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |
| HB 53 v. I HCS1 Transaction Compare GovAmd+ to HCS1.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |
| HB 53 v.I HCS1 MH Capital Project Detail.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |
| HB 55 CS WorkDraft 1 v.I 031125.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 55 |
| HB 55 HCS0MH to HCS1MH (Version N to Version I) Doc Compare - Redline.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 55 |
| HB 53 HCS0 to HCS1 (Verison N to I) Doc Compare - Redline.pdf |
HFIN 3/12/2025 1:30:00 PM |
HB 53 |