Legislature(2019 - 2020)BARNES 124
04/05/2019 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Presentation(s): U.s. Army Corps of Engineers | |
| HB27 | |
| HB3 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 27 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 3 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 3-STATE LAND SALE; PFD VOUCHER AND ASSIGN.
2:34:56 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR announced the final order of business would be
SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 3, "An Act relating to the
purchase and sale of state land; relating to discounts for
veterans on state land purchases; and relating to the assignment
of permanent fund dividends to purchase state land."
[Before the committee was the SSHB 3, introduced and referred to
the House Special Committee on Military and Veterans' Affairs,
committee of first referral, on 3/13/19.]
2:35:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER, sponsor, explained SSHB 3 would allow
utilization of [a person's] permanent fund dividend (PFD) year
after year to help cover the payments on the purchase of state
land. The state disposes of land in various ways each year and
one of them is through a bidding process, he noted. Payment for
the land can be outright or through payments. He said the bill
would also give a 33 percent advantage to veterans for utilizing
in the purchase of state land. Three veterans are co-sponsors
of the bill, he added.
2:37:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN referred to Section 2 and requested a
definition of veteran for use of the benefit proposed in the
bill. She further asked whether the definition is for as little
as 90 days served in the U.S. military.
DARRELL BREESE, Staff, Representative George Rauscher, Alaska
State Legislature, answered questions regarding SSHB 3 on behalf
of Representative Rauscher, sponsor. He confirmed the
definition is 90 days and said the definition can be found on
page 2, lines 4-8, which states: "on active duty in the United
States armed forces for [U.S. ARMED FORCES] at least 90 days,
unless tenure was shortened due to a service connected
disability or due to receiving an early separation upon return
from a tour of duty overseas, and has received an honorable
discharge or a general discharge under honorable conditions."
That definition, he explained, is what is currently in statute
for eligibility for the 25 percent discount that veterans are
currently eligible for.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked how that compares to other veterans'
benefits that the state offers; for example, whether 90 days is
a standard threshold.
MR. BREESE responded that he didn't know and would get back to
the committee with the answer.
2:38:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RASMUSSEN inquired whether there is a cap on the
discount; for example, no matter how much the property costs a
veteran would get a discount exponentially.
MR. BREESE replied that existing statute currently offers a 25
percent discount to veterans. Section 4 of the bill would, in
addition to that, provide a one-third discount. Section 3 of
the bill, page 2, starting on line 9, would limit the veteran to
using one discount at a time - the 25 percent and 33 percent
discount discounts could not be combined - [and each discount]
could only be used once in a lifetime. The limit is set at 33
percent, so if the price of the property were $10 the veteran
would pay $6.66.
CO-CHAIR TARR offered her understanding that if a veteran wished
to purchase two pieces of property, he/she could purchase one of
the properties at a 25 percent discount and the other at a 33
percent discount so long as the veteran signed up with the
mechanism that it be paid through the PFD. So, she continued,
there would be an opportunity for a veteran to potentially
purchase two pieces of property that a discount is applied to,
although one would have to be paid for with a cash payment plan
and to receive the other the veteran would have to assign
his/her PFD toward payment.
MR. BREESE thanked Co-Chair Tarr for clarifying his comments and
agreed she is correct.
2:40:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK stated he doesn't interpret Section 4 as
saying that. He said he interprets Section 4 as meaning that if
a veteran has already purchased land prior to 8/1/19 using the
25 percent [discount], then the veteran can purchase an
additional piece of property at 33 percent [discount], and that
from 8/1/19 onward it would only be the 33 percent [discount].
He asked whether his interpretation is incorrect.
MR. BREESE responded his understanding is that the 25 percent
discount offered under Section 1, which is currently in existing
statute, remains unchanged and that a veteran is still eligible
to purchase that property at 25 percent off. If willing to
assign one's PFD, the limitation is only on land purchased after
8/1/19. So, he continued, if one purchased land prior to 2019
as a veteran, he/she can't then apply the one-third discount to
that purchase. The intention is that the one-third discount is
not until after 8/1/19.
CO-CHAIR TARR requested Mr. Marty Parsons of the Department of
Natural Resources (DNR) to provide clarification regarding the
8/1/19 date and how it applies to the two discount options.
2:42:33 PM
MARTY PARSONS, Director, Central Office, Division of Mining Land
Water and Mining, Department of Natural Resources (DNR), replied
his understanding is that after 8/1/19 would be the first
opportunity to use the one-third discount of pledging the PFD.
CO-CHAIR TARR offered her understanding that the existing
program of a 25 percent discount would remain unchanged.
MR. PARSONS stated that that is his understanding. He said he
doesn't see anywhere in the bill there that is sunset.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK restated his understanding as being that
Section 1 allows a veteran to take advantage of the 25 percent
[discount] and Section 4 would allow the purchase of new land
after 8/1/19, regardless of whether [a purchase prior to 8/1/19]
had been taken advantage of. [A veteran] could take advantage
of the one-third discount, he continued, as long as he/she
[assigned] his/her permanent fund dividend, but it would not be
an option if the PFD weren't used.
MR. BREESE responded that Representative Tuck's understanding is
correct. The one-third discount, he said, is only applicable if
all or a portion of [the veteran's] PFD is assigned to help pay
off the purchase of the land. He added that Section 4,
subsection (g) on page 2, lines 20-21, implies that both
discounts are in existence, because it is stated that the [25
percent and the 33 percent] discounts cannot be combined in one
purchase.
2:44:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK posed a hypothetical scenario of himself as
a veteran making his first purchase of land after 8/1/19 in
which he gets the 33 percent discount because he used his PFD as
collateral or payment. He offered his understanding that at a
later time he could use Section 1 to purchase another piece of
land at a 25 percent [discount].
MR. BREESE answered, "That is the intention of the legislation,
correct."
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK, regarding the aforementioned hypothetical
scenario, asked whether he could use his PFD for that purchase
as well or would be restricted from doing so. He further asked
why it would be wanted to restrict people from using their PFDs
to pay for lands.
MR. BREESE replied that the one-third discount for veterans
purchasing land is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity and the 25
percent discount is also a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. He
explained that Section 5 of the bill would allow anyone, veteran
or non-veteran, to use their PFD to pay off the purchase of the
land. So, yes, if Representative Tuck in the aforementioned
scenario purchased the land with a 25 percent discount, he could
still assign his PFD for payment under Section 5, assuming the
entire dividend hasn't been assigned to pay off the one-third
purchase. The dividend would have to be divided up, he said, in
order to use it for the purchase of both properties.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK asked why the provision for purchasing land
at the one-third discount requires that the veteran's PFD be
assigned for payment.
MR. BREESE responded that the primary focus of the permanent
fund is that [a PFD] be given to everyone in Alaska who wants
one. It's a way of securing the [land] purchase because for
most of the state land sales the purchase is financed by the
state, he said. Using the PFD for payments is made easy because
it only requires the checking of a box. It is convenience, he
added, and it is also for encouraging veterans to buy land in
Alaska.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK surmised that if he were to miss the PFD
application deadline, he would not have the 33 percent
[discount] available to him.
MR. BREESE confirmed that the 33 percent discount could not be
used if [a veteran] did not apply for, or was not eligible for,
a PFD.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK asked what would happen if his full PFD was
garnished.
MR. BREESE deferred to the Department of Revenue (DOR) to answer
the question.
2:48:46 PM
ANNE WESKE, Director, Permanent Fund Dividend Division,
Department of Revenue (DOR), responded to Representative Tuck's
question. She explained that, if a garnishment occurs, usually
the first priority is a garnishment, not a voluntary
contribution, or, in this case, an assignment. So, the funds
would go to the garnishing agency, she said, and then DNR would
be notified that no funds would be processed on [DNR's] behalf.
That means it would fall on DNR to collect if DNR had already
pre-credited this individual or it would fall on DNR to contact
the individual that the funds didn't come DNR's way due to a
garnishment.
REPRESENTATIVE TUCK stated he doesn't know why it would be
wanted to put a condition on the one-third discount for veterans
based on whether they file for a PFD. He said he understands
why it would be wanted to provide the ability to pay for lands
using permanent fund dividends.
2:50:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked how many veterans have currently
taken advantage of the current discount of 25 percent. She
further asked for the ratio of the number of parcels for sale
each year and the number of veterans who took advantage of them.
MR. PARSONS answered that roughly an average of 17 veterans per
year take advantage of the current 25 percent discount. Last
year, he said, 80 parcels were sold under the state land sales
program and 14 or 15 veterans took advantage of it.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN inquired whether payments to the state for
most land sales are monthly payments or annual payments in which
a person's PFD would achieve the payment.
MR. PARSONS replied there are multiple payment options under
which a purchaser can contract with the state annual, monthly,
and quarterly - for which the purchaser signs a contract.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN posed a scenario of $3,000 for the PFD in
2019 and asked whether that amount would cover the annual
payment for the average parcel purchased by a veteran.
MR. PARSONS responded it depends, because land across the state
varies widely in its value. The land is sold at fair market
value, he explained, which is determined through an appraisal.
Land in Interior Alaska might sell for $13,000 or $14,000 for a
five-acre parcel, while a smaller parcel in Southeast Alaska
might sell for $30,000 or $40,000. There are cases where $3,000
could cover the entire payment for the year, he said, but in
most cases, it would cover a portion of it.
MR. BREESE drew attention to page 2 of the DNR fiscal note,
which states: "Over 19 years of tracking the 25 percent
veterans discount, veterans have purchased an average of 14
parcels of state land a year." He also noted that according to
the fiscal note the average price per parcel is $18,300.
2:54:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ inquired whether an "eligible veteran"
as described under Section 1 of the bill must be an Alaska
resident.
MR. BREESE deferred to Mr. Parsons for an answer, but noted that
Section 1 doesn't say an eligible veteran must be an Alaskan.
MR. PARSONS replied that the initial auction under which these
lands would be sold are for Alaska residents.
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ offered her understanding that the one-
third discount and being eligible for a PFD isn't a matter of
determining that only Alaskan residents are using this benefit.
MR. BREESE replied that page 1, lines 13-14, state, "has been a
state resident for a period of not less than one year
immediately preceding the date of sale". Therefore, he said,
[the veteran] would have to be an Alaska resident.
2:56:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RASMUSSEN asked whether the closing costs for
these sales are typically negotiated or whether there is a
standard breakdown of who pays what for the closing costs.
MR. BREESE deferred to Mr. Parsons for the answer.
MR. PARSONS responded that [the land sales program] doesn't have
a closing cost. He said the purchaser puts down a bid deposit
when the land is purchased and if the purchaser goes into a
state contract those payments get rolled into the contract.
REPRESENTATIVE RASMUSSEN inquired whether a title is involved
with these land sales.
MR. PARSONS answered that the unique thing about Alaska land
sales is that the title remains with the state and does not pass
to the purchaser until the purchaser has completely paid off the
purchase obligation.
REPRESENTATIVE RASMUSSEN asked how the purchaser has anything to
show for the money he/she has put into the purchase if there is
nothing in title on record.
MR. PARSONS replied that unique to Alaska's land sales program
is that there is not equity that the purchaser gains until such
time as the purchaser has paid off the entire contractual
obligation. The title remains with the state, he said, and is
not patented to the purchaser until the purchaser has completely
paid off the contract.
2:58:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RASMUSSEN asked who pays the recording costs and
other fees for the change in title once the purchaser has paid
off the contract.
MR. PARSONS responded that, in receiving the title, there is a
cost of $250 to the purchaser for the processing of documents
and issuing the patent.
REPRESENTATIVE RASMUSSEN noted there isn't a set amount for the
PFD and asked whether there is something in place that the
purchaser must pay a certain [minimum] amount each year.
MR. BREESE answered that under the bill the purchaser can assign
his/her PFD to pay all or a portion of the payment due to DNR,
so the PFD could cover the full payment or only a small portion
of the payment that is remaining.
3:00:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RASMUSSEN said her concern with the verbiage is
that it doesn't set a minimum payment. She suggested this could
be covered via an amendment so as to ensure that the state is
protected. She inquired about the point at which the state
would foreclose for nonpayment, for example if a purchaser's PFD
was garnished.
MR. BREESE replied that this is not a garnishment, but an
assignment of the PFD. He deferred to Mr. Parsons to answer
about penalties for late or nonpayment.
REPRESENTATIVE RASMUSSEN clarified she was speaking to a
purchaser not receiving his/her PFD because it was garnished,
and the purchaser was therefore unable to pay.
CO-CHAIR TARR asked Mr. Parsons about the timeline for when a
contract would become null and void for nonpayment.
MR. PARSONS responded it varies. He said the division normally
works hard with its customers to get them back on track, so they
don't lose their interest in the land. Normally after 90 days,
he continued, the division begins a letter writing campaign to
get the purchaser back into compliance. Then there is a series
of several months during which the division walks through
different types of notices until getting to the point where the
division writes the purchaser a letter stating that the division
directors have decided that the purchaser's contract is void and
the purchaser has 30 days to pay the remaining balance or the
contract will be cancelled. The division tries very hard not to
cancel contracts and take back properties, he added.
3:03:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RASMUSSEN surmised there is nothing in statute
that says at a certain point in time the state must take back
the land. She said she appreciates the division working with
people, but she is concerned because this is a business.
MR. PARSONS answered the division works very hard with its
customers because it is a very generous program as far as the
ability to enter into contractual obligations. He noted the
state has taken steps over the past several years where it had
an egregious contract holder that it couldn't bring back into
compliance and the contract was cancelled and the state took
back the land. The division tries to make that the exception as
opposed to the rule. He said the division understands that the
real estate is a business and the division can cancel the
contract any time after an individual has been determined to be
in default.
REPRESENTATIVE TALERICO inquired whether the sponsor's intent is
for people to be able to use the PFD, and the PFD only, to pay
off the land purchase regardless of its cost.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER answered that that wasn't quite in his
intent.
REPRESENTATIVE TALERICO recalled that he introduced a similar
bill, but it was incredibly complicated, and those complications
were probably why it didn't advance very far. He said he likes
the simplicity of SSHB 3 and surmises the general idea of the
bill is that there would be less cash flow out of state coffers
as well as the ability to provide someone with equal or greater
value for his/her permanent fund [dividend].
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER replied he had many reasons for the
bill. "It is just moving in computer numbers more than
handwritten checks and contracts and payments and non-payments
and default payments and all this other stuff," he said, so it
did have an ease of that; I appreciate that." He said he
realizes after listening to Representative Tuck and the answers
he was given that it probably wasn't his intent to have both of
them sitting side-by-side utilized. He said he will be offering
a friendly amendment to page 2, line 10, to replace "and" with
"or and that way [a veteran] can use the program he/she sees
fit, if such an amendment is possible.
3:06:53 PM
CO-CHAIR TARR opened public testimony on SSHB 3. After
ascertaining no one wished to testify, public testimony was
closed.
3:07:27 PM
[HB 3 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 27 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 3/6/2020 3:15:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/24/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/27/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/29/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/31/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/3/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/5/2020 1:00:00 PM |
HB 27 |
| HB27 Bill Version U 1.11.19.PDF |
HL&C 3/6/2020 3:15:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/24/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/27/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/29/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/31/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/3/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/5/2020 1:00:00 PM |
HB 27 |
| HB27 Bill Version U 1.11.19Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HL&C 3/6/2020 3:15:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/24/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/27/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/29/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/31/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/3/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/5/2020 1:00:00 PM |
HB 27 |
| HB27 Fiscal Note - Dept of Law 3.29.19.pdf |
HL&C 3/6/2020 3:15:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/3/2020 1:00:00 PM |
HB 27 |
| HB27 Supporting Document - CDC - Skin Exposures and Effects.pdf |
HL&C 3/6/2020 3:15:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/24/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/3/2020 1:00:00 PM |
HB 27 |
| HB27 Supporting Document - Expert Testimony Vytenis Babrauskas.pdf |
HL&C 3/6/2020 3:15:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/24/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/3/2020 1:00:00 PM |
HB 27 |
| HB27 Supporting Document - Flame Retardants - NIH Fact Sheet July 2016.pdf |
HL&C 3/6/2020 3:15:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/24/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/27/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/3/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/5/2020 1:00:00 PM |
HB 27 |
| HB27 Supporting Document - Knoblauch article 1.24.18.pdf |
HL&C 3/6/2020 3:15:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/24/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/3/2020 1:00:00 PM |
HB 27 |
| HB27 Supporting Document - Leg Research on FF health costs.pdf |
HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/24/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/3/2020 1:00:00 PM |
HB 27 |
| HB 27 Flame Retardants Slide Presentation 4.2.19.pdf |
HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - Athey 2.4.19.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - School Nurses 3.12.19.pdf |
HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Letter of Support from ACS CAN AK 2.21.19.pdf |
HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Letters of Support from Firefighters 4.2.19.pdf |
HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/24/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/27/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/29/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/3/2020 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/5/2020 1:00:00 PM |
HB 27 |
| HB27 Supporting Document - Past Support re Flame Retardants in AK.pdf |
HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 27 |
| HB27 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - GCDSE 4.1.19.pdf |
HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Aronno Letter of Support 4.4.19_Redacted.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Letters of Support Combined.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - American Chemistry Council Letter of Opposition 4.3.19.pdf |
HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Juvenile Products Manufacturers Association Letter of Opposition 4.2.19.pdf |
HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Consumer Technology Association Letter of Opposition 4.3.19.pdf |
HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB 27 Flame Retardants Slide Presentation 4.2.19.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 1/24/2020 1:00:00 PM |
HB 27 |
| HB27 Supporting Document - Testimony Learning Disabilities Assoc 4.3.19.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - Propes 4.1.19.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - AK Children's Trust 4.2.19.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - AK Fire Chiefs Assoc 4.2.19.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - AK Nurses Association 3.29.19.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - AKPIRG 4.3.19.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - Kawerak Inc 4.3.19.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Letter of Support - McLaughlin 4.3.19.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB 3 Sponsor Statement 3.12.2019.pdf |
HMLV 3/14/2019 2:00:00 PM HMLV 3/26/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/12/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Ver A 3.12.2019.pdf |
HMLV 3/14/2019 2:00:00 PM HMLV 3/26/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/12/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Ver M 3.12.2019.pdf |
HMLV 3/14/2019 2:00:00 PM HMLV 3/26/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/12/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Explanation of Changes 3.12.2019.pdf |
HMLV 3/14/2019 2:00:00 PM HMLV 3/26/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/12/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 DOR Fiscal Note.pdf |
HMLV 3/26/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/12/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB3 DNR Fiscal Note.pdf |
HMLV 3/26/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/3/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM HRES 4/12/2019 1:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB27 Supporting Document - AKPFFA Letter 4.4.19.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Whitson Letter of Support 4.4.19_Redacted.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Fuller Letter of Support 4.4.19_Redacted.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB27 Supporting Document - Hauser Letter of Support 4.4.19_Redacted.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HRES US Army Corps of Engineers Presentation Pebble 4.5.19.pdf |
HRES 4/5/2019 1:00:00 PM |
Pebble |