Legislature(2023 - 2024)ADAMS 519
05/05/2023 09:30 AM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB66 | |
| HB28 | |
| HB3 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 28 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 66 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 3 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 3
"An Act relating to specie as legal tender in the
state; and relating to borough and city sales and use
taxes on specie."
1:50:00 PM
Co-Chair Johnson MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 3, Work Draft 33-LS0087\S (Nauman,
5/4/23).
Co-Chair Foster OBJECTED for discussion. He asked his staff
to explain the changes in the CS.
BRODIE ANDERSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE NEAL FOSTER, relayed
that the CS contained one change from the previous bill
version. He directed attention to page 2, line 21. He
detailed that the previous version of the bill used the
House Finance Committee as the point of origin directing a
study to be conducted. The CS changed the reference to the
Legislative Budget and Audit (LB&A) Committee per the
sponsor's request. He explained it had been suggested that
the House Finance Committee may not be the most appropriate
committee to direct a study and that LB&A was more
suitable.
Co-Chair Foster WITHDREW the OBJECTION to the adoption of
the CS. There being NO further OBJECTION, it was so
ordered. He invited the bill sponsor to make any comments.
REPRESENTATIVE KEVIN MCCABE, SPONSOR, appreciated the
committee hearing the bill and supported the change in the
CS.
Representative Hannan asked if Legislative Legal Services
had weighed in on the bill provision dictating a committee
to take action and whether the legislature had the ability
to do so under statute. Additionally, she wondered whether
Legislative Legal had specified what would happen if the
specific committee did not take action dictated by statute
in the bill.
Representative McCabe responded that his office had not had
any conversation specific to whether the legislature could
direct LB&A to [direct a study]. He believed Legislative
Legal had drafted the CS and no problem had been indicated;
however, he had not specifically asked the question.
1:54:29 PM
Representative Hannan MOVED to ADOPT conceptual Amendment 1
to change the word "shall" to "may" on page 2, line 21. She
was concerned that without a legal memorandum indicating
the action was legal, the House Finance Committee could
perhaps be establishing a mandate directing another
committee to do something that it did not have authority
over. She stated that if the bill passed, the record would
indicate there was interest in LB&A doing so and LB&A would
take the interest under advisement. She believed the bill
sponsor would also work with LB&A to implore the committee
to take action.
Co-Chair Johnson OBJECTED.
Co-Chair Foster asked Representative McCabe for his opinion
on the conceptual amendment.
Representative McCabe replied that he would not have a
problem with changing the language to "may." He was unclear
whether the House Finance Committee had received a legal
opinion. He shared that the original bill did not have any
memo addressing the topic [raised by Representative
Hannan].
Co-Chair Edgmon heard the point by Representative Hannan
but he highlighted that the word "shall" did not imply they
[LB&A] must [take action], in the sense that there was a
time frame attached it could be five or ten years later. He
thought changing the word from "shall" to "may" in some
ways changed the intent of the legislation. He did not
support the amendment.
Representative Stapp valued the intent of the conceptual
amendment, but he thought inserting the word "may" would
render the bulk of the bill irrelevant. He elaborated the
change would mean there was no action taken tied to any
specific timeframe or date regarding legal tender. He
believed the result would be a bill with no directive to do
anything, which would undermine the concept of the bill. He
did not support the amendment.
1:57:53 PM
Co-Chair Johnson referenced the statement [made by
Representative Hannan] that the House Finance Committee
would be giving direction to a committee it may not have
jurisdiction over. She pointed out that by the time the
bill passed it would be seen and voted on by the entire
legislature. She stated that the entire legislature had the
ability to direct other committees.
Representative Hannan provided wrap up on the conceptual
amendment. She stated that the majority of the bill was not
about the study. She did not believe in doing things that
seemed to be confusing in their intent.
Co-Chair Johnson MAINTAINED the OBJECTION.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Galvin, Hannan, Josephson, Ortiz
OPPOSED: Stapp, Tomaszewski, Coloumbe, Cronk, Edgmon,
Johnson, Foster
The MOTION to adopt conceptual Amendment 1 FAILED (4/7).
Co-Chair Johnson MOVED to REPORT CSHB 3(FIN) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes.
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
CSHB 3(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with six "do
pass" recommendations, one "no recommendation"
recommendation, and two "amend" recommendations and with
two previously published zero notes: FN1 (ADM) and FN2
(CED).
Representative McCabe thanked the committee.
Co-Chair Foster reviewed the schedule for the next meeting.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 3 CS WORKDRAFT FIN v S 050423 .pdf |
HFIN 5/5/2023 9:30:00 AM |
HB 3 |
| HB 28 Amendments 1-2 050423.pdf |
HFIN 5/5/2023 9:30:00 AM |
HB 28 |
| HB 66 Amendments 1-9 050423.pdf |
HFIN 5/5/2023 9:30:00 AM |
HB 66 |
| HB 66 Amendments 1-9 050423 w Actions 050523.pdf |
HFIN 5/5/2023 9:30:00 AM |
HB 66 |
| HB 66 DOC Response to HFIN - 050823 .pdf |
HFIN 5/5/2023 9:30:00 AM |
HB 66 |
| HB 3 Public Testimony Rec'd by 050523.pdf |
HFIN 5/5/2023 9:30:00 AM |
HB 3 |
| HB 66 Public Testimony Rec'd by 050523.pdf |
HFIN 5/5/2023 9:30:00 AM |
HB 66 |
| HB 28 Public Testimony Red'd by 050523.pdf |
HFIN 5/5/2023 9:30:00 AM |
HB 28 |