Legislature(2013 - 2014)CAPITOL 120
02/18/2013 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB1 | |
| HB69 | |
| HB73 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 1 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 69 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 73 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 1 - REQUIREMENTS FOR DRIVER'S LICENSE
1:04:19 PM
CHAIR KELLER announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 1, "An Act relating to issuance of drivers'
licenses." [Before the committee was CSHB 1(STA).]
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN, as one of the joint prime sponsors,
characterized HB 1 as a "commonsense bill" and explained that
under it: the Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) would be able to
issue a foreign person a driver's license for a period of less
than five years if the person is authorized to stay in the
United States for less than five years or indefinitely; and the
foreign person, [for a period of up to five years after the
license is first issued,] may be able to renew the license
without fee, though if the period of authorized stay is
indefinite, the license shall have to be renewed yearly. He
offered his understanding that under current law, a foreign
person who is authorized to stay in the country for less than
five years can still obtain a driver's license that's valid for
five years, and opined that this doesn't any make sense. In
conclusion he surmised that the DMV would be capable of
complying with HB 1.
1:06:19 PM
FORREST WOLFE, Staff, Representative Bob Lynn, on behalf of
Representative Lynn, one of the joint prime sponsors of HB 1,
pointed out that it's the federal government that determines how
long foreign persons may legally stay in the United States, and
remarked that the state should not be issuing [driver's licenses
that are valid] in excess of such federally-authorized lengths
of stay. House Bill 1 would authorize the DMV to issue driver's
licenses with durations of less than five years in certain
circumstances. He offered his understanding that under the
bill, foreign persons whose federally-authorized length of stay
is less than five years would have their driver's license expire
at the same time as the authorized length of stay; that this
reflects best practice according to the American Association of
Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA); and that 36 other states
and the District of Columbia have similar laws/regulations.
MR. WOLFE, too, noted that under the bill, renewal of such
driver's licenses would be without fee for a period of up to
five years after the license is first issued; and that if the
period of authorized stay is indefinite, the license shall have
to be renewed yearly. House Bill 1 addresses only driver's
licenses, not State-issued identification (ID) cards, and
wouldn't change how a person obtains a driver's license, or what
documentation shall be required by the DMV. If a person uses
what he referred to as "immigration" documentation to establish
his/her identity, however, then the DMV shall issue a driver's
license with the same expiration date as used in that
documentation. Similar legislation, he noted in conclusion,
passed the House during the last legislature. In response to a
question, he offered his belief that HB 1 would not negatively
impact people living in rural Alaska any more than it would
those living elsewhere in Alaska.
REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT referred to a letter in members' packets
from attorney Margaret Stock expressing points of concern with
HB 1 and noting that similar laws in other states have not
withstood legal challenge, and questioned whether research has
been conducted into the constitutionality of HB 1, into whether
the DMV would be able to comply the bill, and into how the bill
would impact Alaska's foreign seasonal workers.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN reiterated that HB 1 would provide the DMV
with the authority to issue driver's licenses with durations of
less than five years.
1:13:47 PM
AMY ERICKSON, Director, Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV),
Department of Administration (DOA), relayed that none of the
DMV's practices would change under HB 1, and that DMV employees
have been trained to deal with the documents required for
driver's licenses.
1:14:42 PM
KATHLEEN STRASBAUGH, Attorney, Legislative Legal Counsel,
Legislative Legal and Research Services, Legislative Affairs
Agency (LAA), in response to a question, said she herself was
not aware of any challenges to laws similar to that being
proposed by HB 1.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG disclosed that he knows Ms. Stock, an
expert in immigration law and a former professor at the United
States Military Academy West Point. He then suggested that the
title of HB 1 be narrowed.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN said he would not object to doing so.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG expressed concern that HB 1 could
result in practical problems for those living in communities
that do not have a DMV office.
1:19:42 PM
RICHARD SVOBODNY, Deputy Attorney General, Central Office,
Criminal Division, Department of Law (DOL), relayed that the DOL
has reviewed HB 1 and has found no constitutional problems
with it.
CHAIR KELLER observed that the bill itself doesn't address
documentation.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX, in response to a question, noted that the
aforementioned letter from Ms. Stock includes a statistic from
the Center for Migration Studies indicating that Alaska's
unauthorized immigrant population is less than 5,000 people.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG pointed out that existing
AS 28.15.101(c)(1) says that a driver's license may not be
renewed by mail if the most recent renewal was by mail, and
surmised, therefore, that under HB 1, a foreign person would
have to renew his/her driver's license in person at a DMV office
at least every other time he/she renews it. This could become
onerous for those living in rural Alaska.
1:25:39 PM
MATTHEW KERR opined that HB 1 would needlessly bloat Alaska's
bureaucracy, would slow down processing at the DMV, and would
cause a lot of trouble to people who are following the law - all
to solve a nonexistent problem in Alaska. He questioned the
legislature's goal in limiting the validity of some driver's
licenses. If it's not to address an immigration issue, then
what type of driving violation would warrant such a limitation?
Would the State of Alaska prefer that foreign people simply
continue to use their foreign driver's licenses? For many
individuals, the period of legal presence in the United States
can change on a daily/weekly basis, often changing faster than
the associated documentation. Even under existing law, a friend
of his in the country legally, he relayed, had to go
"DMV shopping" in order to find DMV personnel who could
comprehend his complete and correct documentation. It appears
that the concept of HB 1 is derived from a simplified and
utopian view of U.S. immigration law, a view that fails,
however, to comprehend what an expensive, bureaucratic mess HB 1
would create. In conclusion, he said he supports having the
drivers who share the road with him pass the DMV's examination
requirements, but doesn't support punishing foreign persons who
are in the country legally, and that that is why he opposes
HB 1.
1:28:05 PM
DEAN WAUSON - after referring to points raised in the
aforementioned letter by Ms. Stock and by previous testifiers,
and mentioning that he enforces federal immigration laws -
characterized HB 1 as a commonsense piece of legislation, and
offered his belief that it wouldn't cause any problems for the
DMV or increase anyone's costs.
1:33:18 PM
JEFFREY LANDFIELD said he doesn't think that Alaska has a
problem needing to be solved by HB 1, and that he believes the
bill would massively increase bureaucracy. Mentioning that he
has a lot of foreign friends in the country legally under
different statuses, he, too, offered an example of a foreign
person, a student, in the country legally who couldn't get DMV
personnel to comprehend the documentation provided. He
characterized HB 1 as having everything to do with immigration,
and said he doesn't think that the DMV is equipped to deal with
such a complex issue. In conclusion, he reiterated that he
doesn't think a problem exists in Alaska, and predicted that
HB 1 would instead cause problems, and would be expensive and
burdensome for the people it applies to.
CHAIR KELLER observed that the DMV has submitted a zero fiscal
note for HB 1.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN, in conclusion, said that under HB 1,
foreign persons would have their driver's license expire at the
same time as their foreign documentation; that this reflects
best practice; and that other states have passed similar laws.
MR. LANDFIELD pointed out, however, that such documentation
wouldn't necessarily reflect the most up-to-date information
about the foreign person's status and legal presence.
CHAIR KELLER closed public testimony, and relayed that
[CSHB 1(STA)] would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB1 Sponsor Statement (rev).pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB1 ver O.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB 1 Version A.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| Fiscal Note CSHB 1 (STA).pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB1 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB 1 Supporting Documents AK Association of Chiefs of Police Support.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| CSHB 01 (STA) ACLU Review Const'l Issues.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB1 Citizen Letter of Opposition.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB1 Supporting Documents - FAQ Sheet.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB1 Witness List HJUD.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| CSHB 69 ver O.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 69 |
| HB 69-Pittman Wildlife Restoration.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 69 |
| HB 69 Support--City of Wasilla.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 69 |