Legislature(2025 - 2026)
2025-05-18 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2025-05-18 House Journal Page 1302 SB 133 Representative Costello moved and asked unanimous consent that the following, which was not advanced to third reading (page 1297), be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage: Representative Allard objected. The question being: "Shall CSSB 133(L&C) advance to third reading on the same day?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 133(L&C) Second Reading Advance to Third Reading on the Same Day YEAS: 33 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 2025-05-18 House Journal Page 1303 Yeas: Burke, Bynum, Carrick, Costello, Coulombe, Dibert, Edgmon, Eischeid, Elam, Fields, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Hall, Hannan, Himschoot, Holland, Jimmie, Josephson, Kopp, Mears, Mina, Moore, Nelson, Prax, Ruffridge, Saddler, Schrage, Stapp, Story, Stutes, Tomaszewski, Underwood Nays: Allard, Johnson, McCabe, Rauscher, Schwanke, Tilton, Vance And so, the motion passed. CSSB 133(L&C) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSSB 133(L&C) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 133(L&C) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Allard, Burke, Bynum, Carrick, Costello, Coulombe, Dibert, Edgmon, Eischeid, Elam, Fields, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Hall, Hannan, Himschoot, Holland, Jimmie, Johnson, Josephson, Kopp, McCabe, Mears, Mina, Moore, Nelson, Prax, Rauscher, Ruffridge, Saddler, Schrage, Schwanke, Stapp, Story, Stutes, Tilton, Tomaszewski, Underwood, Vance And so, CSSB 133(L&C) passed the House. Representative Kopp moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Ruffridge gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSSB 133(L&C). SB 133 Representative Ruffridge moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of CSSB 133(L&C) be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2025-05-18 House Journal Page 1304 CSSB 133(L&C) was before the House in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSSB 133(L&C) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 133(L&C) Third Reading Final Passage Reconsideration YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Allard, Burke, Bynum, Carrick, Costello, Coulombe, Dibert, Edgmon, Eischeid, Elam, Fields, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Hall, Hannan, Himschoot, Holland, Jimmie, Johnson, Josephson, Kopp, McCabe, Mears, Mina, Moore, Nelson, Prax, Rauscher, Ruffridge, Saddler, Schrage, Schwanke, Stapp, Story, Stutes, Tilton, Tomaszewski, Underwood, Vance And so, CSSB 133(L&C) passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Kopp moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSSB 133(L&C) was signed by the Speaker and Chief Clerk and returned to the Senate.