Legislature(2025 - 2026)
2026-05-17 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2026-05-17 Senate Journal Page 2720 HB 298 HOUSE BILL NO. 298 "An Act relating to the Legislative Ethics Act; relating to legislative subpoenas; relating to the jurisdiction of the office of the ombudsman; and providing for an effective date" was read the second time. Senator Claman, Chair, moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the Judiciary Senate Committee Substitute offered on page 2567. Without objection, SENATE CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 298(JUD) was adopted. Senator Giessel moved and asked unanimous consent the bill be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Without objection, it was so ordered. SENATE CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 298(JUD) was read the third time. Senators Claman, Giessel, Stedman, Tobin, Kawasaki, Stevens moved and asked unanimous consent to be shown as cross sponsors on the bill. Without objection, it was so ordered. 2026-05-17 Senate Journal Page 2721 The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 298(JUD) "An Act relating to the Legislative Ethics Act; relating to legislative subpoenas; relating to the jurisdiction of the office of the ombudsman; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS HB 298(JUD) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date(s) YEAS: 20 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bjorkman, Claman, Cronk, Dunbar, Giessel, Gray-Jackson, Hoffman, Kaufman, Kawasaki, Kiehl, Merrick, Myers, Olson, Rauscher, Stedman, Stevens, Tilton, Tobin, Wielechowski, Yundt and so, SENATE CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 298(JUD) passed the Senate. Senator Giessel moved and asked unanimous consent the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.