Legislature(2025 - 2026)
2025-04-16 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2025-04-16 House Journal Page 0821 HB 75 Representative Bynum moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of CSHB 75(STA) be taken up on the same day. There was objection. The question being: "Shall reconsideration of CSHB 75(STA) be taken up on the same day?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(STA) Third Reading Take Up Reconsideration on the Same Day YEAS: 35 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Burke, Bynum, Carrick, Costello, Coulombe, Dibert, Edgmon, Eischeid, Elam, Fields, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Hall, Hannan, Himschoot, Holland, Jimmie, Johnson, Josephson, Kopp, Mears, Mina, Moore, Nelson, Prax, Ruffridge, Saddler, Schrage, Schwanke, Stapp, Story, Stutes, Tomaszewski, Underwood 2025-04-16 House Journal Page 0822 Nays: Allard, McCabe, Rauscher, Tilton, Vance And so, the motion passed. The following was before the House in third reading: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 75(STA) "An Act relating to national criminal history record checks for certain employees of the Department of Revenue; relating to allowable absences for eligibility for a permanent fund dividend; relating to the confidentiality of certain information provided on a permanent fund dividend application; relating to electronic notice of debt collection executed on a permanent fund dividend; and providing for an effective date." The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSHB 75(STA) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 75(STA) Third Reading Final Passage Reconsideration YEAS: 35 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Burke, Bynum, Carrick, Costello, Coulombe, Dibert, Edgmon, Eischeid, Elam, Fields, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Hall, Hannan, Himschoot, Holland, Jimmie, Johnson, Josephson, Kopp, Mears, Mina, Moore, Nelson, Prax, Ruffridge, Saddler, Schrage, Schwanke, Stapp, Story, Stutes, Tomaszewski, Underwood Nays: Allard, McCabe, Rauscher, Tilton, Vance And so, CSHB 75(STA) passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Kopp moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 75(STA) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.