2024-05-15                     House Journal                      Page 3320
HB 202                                                                                                                        
Representative Saddler moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                               
House consider the Senate message.  There being no objection, it was                                                            
so ordered.                                                                                                                     

2024-05-15                     House Journal                      Page 3321
Representative Saddler moved that the House concur in the Senate                                                                
amendment and recommended that the members vote yes.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Representatives Vance, Tomaszewski, Stapp, Ruffridge, Eastman, and                                                              
Carpenter moved and asked unanimous consent to abstain from voting                                                              
because of a conflict of interest.  Objection was heard, and they were                                                          
required to vote.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall the House concur in the Senate                                                                      
amendment?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSHB 202(FIN) am S(efd add S)                                                                                               
Concur                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  40   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Allard, Armstrong, Baker, Carpenter, Carrick, Coulombe,                                                                  
Cronk, Dibert, Eastman, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Groh,                                                             
Hannan, Himschoot, C.Johnson, D.Johnson, Josephson, McCabe,                                                                     
McCormick, McKay, Mears, Mina, Ortiz, Prax, Rauscher, Ruffridge,                                                                
Saddler, Schrage, Shaw, Stapp, Story, Stutes, Sumner, Tilton,                                                                   
Tomaszewski, Vance, Wright                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting                                                              
SCS CSHB 202(FIN) am S(efd add S).                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Representative Saddler moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                               
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                         
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The Chief Clerk notified the Senate.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The bill was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.