Legislature(2023 - 2024)
2024-05-15 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2024-05-15 House Journal Page 3320 HB 202 A message dated May 15 was read stating the Senate passed: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 202(EDC) "An Act relating to the availability and administration of opioid overdose drugs in public schools." with the following amendment, and it is transmitted for consideration: SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 202(FIN) am S(efd add S) "An Act relating to the availability and administration of opioid overdose drugs in public schools; relating to correspondence study programs; and relating to allotments for correspondence study programs; and relating to an annual report relating to Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration grants and opioid overdose drug distribution; and providing for an effective date." (SCR 26 - title change resolution) HB 202 Representative Saddler moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2024-05-15 House Journal Page 3321 Representative Saddler moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment and recommended that the members vote yes. Representatives Vance, Tomaszewski, Stapp, Ruffridge, Eastman, and Carpenter moved and asked unanimous consent to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and they were required to vote. The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 202(FIN) am S(efd add S) Concur YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Allard, Armstrong, Baker, Carpenter, Carrick, Coulombe, Cronk, Dibert, Eastman, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Groh, Hannan, Himschoot, C.Johnson, D.Johnson, Josephson, McCabe, McCormick, McKay, Mears, Mina, Ortiz, Prax, Rauscher, Ruffridge, Saddler, Schrage, Shaw, Stapp, Story, Stutes, Sumner, Tilton, Tomaszewski, Vance, Wright And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting SCS CSHB 202(FIN) am S(efd add S). Representative Saddler moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. The bill was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.