Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2021-05-12 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2021-05-12 House Journal Page 1029 HJR 19 The following was before the house with Amendment No. 3 moved and pending: CS FOR HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 19(L&C) am Supporting widespread infrastructure investment in the state. Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Rauscher: Following second occurrence of "Port": Delete "of" Insert "in" Representative Rauscher moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Edgmon objected. 2021-05-12 House Journal Page 1030 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHJR 19(L&C) am Second Reading Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 25 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Claman, Eastman, Fields, Gillham, Hopkins, Johnson, Kurka, LeBon, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Schrage, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Thompson, Tilton, Vance, Wool Nays: Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Hannan, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, Snyder, Tarr, Tuck, Zulkosky Absent: Carpenter, Cronk, McCabe, Patkotak And so, Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 3 was adopted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHJR 19(L&C) am Second Reading Amendment No. 3 as amended YEAS: 15 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Eastman, Gillham, Hopkins, Johnson, Kurka, LeBon, McCarty, Nelson, Prax, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Vance, Wool Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, McKay, Merrick, Ortiz, Rasmussen, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Zulkosky Absent: Carpenter, Cronk, McCabe, Patkotak And so, Amendment No. 3 as amended was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Eastman: 2021-05-12 House Journal Page 1031 Page 2, line 18: Insert "WHEREAS Port Mackenzie is the only port in Alaska that can boast 9,033 acres, 14 square miles dedicated to commercial and industrial development; and" Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Fields objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHJR 19(L&C) am Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, Nelson, Prax, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, McKay, Merrick, Ortiz, Rasmussen, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Absent: Patkotak And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 2, lines 18-21: Delete all material. Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Fields objected. 2021-05-12 House Journal Page 1032 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHJR 19(L&C) am Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McKay, Prax, Rauscher, Thompson, Tilton Nays: Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, McCarty, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Patkotak, Rasmussen, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representative Kaufman: Page 2, line 22: Insert "WHEREAS other ports in Alaska need significant investment to improve, expand, and thereby provide increased resilience to the state; and" Renumber accordingly. Representative Kaufman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. There being no objection, Amendment No. 6 was adopted. Amendment No. 7 was offered by Representative Kaufman: Page 2, line 18, following "Alaska" Insert "in Anchorage" Page 2, line 20, following "Alaska" Insert "in Anchorage" Representative Kaufman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 7 be adopted. 2021-05-12 House Journal Page 1033 Objection was heard and withdrawn. There being no further objection Amendment No. 7 was adopted. Amendment No. 8 was offered by Representatives Thompson and Cronk: Page 1, line 1, following "state" (title amendment): Insert "; and requesting that the Alaska Energy Authority develop a 10-year infrastructure plan to reduce power costs in areas of the state that endure high electric and heating costs" Page 3, line 5, following "state": Insert "; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the Alaska State Legislature requests that the Alaska Energy Authority, in coordination with utilities throughout the state, develop a 10-year infrastructure plan to reduce power costs in areas of the state that endure extremely high electric and heating costs" Page 3, line 11: Delete "and" Page 3, line 13, following "Congress": Insert "; and Curtis Thayer, Executive Director, Alaska Energy Authority" Representative Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 8 be adopted. Representative Schrage objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHJR 19(L&C) am Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 2021-05-12 House Journal Page 1034 Yeas: Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Vance, Wool Nays: Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Ortiz, Patkotak, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Zulkosky And so, Amendment No. 8 was not adopted. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHJR 19(L&C) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHJR 19(L&C) am was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHJR 19(L&C) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHJR 19(L&C) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 30 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Patkotak, Prax, Rasmussen, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Kaufman, Kurka, McCabe, Rauscher, Tilton Absent: Johnson And so, CSHJR 19(L&C) am passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.