2022-05-18                     House Journal                      Page 3135
HB 349                                                                                                                        
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                                  
House consider the Senate message (page 3061) on the following:                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 349(RES)                                                                                             
     "An Act relating to the establishment of oil and gas drilling units,                                                       
     spacing, and patterns."                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
and                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
     CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 349(RES) am S (efd add S)                                                                            
     "An Act relating to the establishment of oil and gas drilling units,                                                       
     spacing, and patterns; providing for the transfer of and addition of                                                       
     names to a personal use cabin permit for a cabin on state land; and                                                        
     providing for an effective date."                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     (SCR 29 - title change resolution)                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved that the House concur in the Senate                                                                   
amendment and recommended that the members vote yes.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                

2022-05-18                     House Journal                      Page 3136
The question being:  "Shall the House concur in the Senate                                                                      
amendment?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 349(RES) am S(efd add S)                                                                                                   
Concur                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  35   NAYS:  4   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  1                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Carpenter, Cronk, Drummond, Eastman, Fields, Foster,                                                                     
Gillham, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins,                                                                     
Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Ortiz, Patkotak,                                                                  
Rasmussen, Rauscher, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story,                                                                   
Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Claman, Edgmon, Josephson, Prax                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Absent:  Merrick                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Schrage changed from "NAY" to "YEA"                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting                                                              
CSHB 349(RES) am S(SCR add S).                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll                                                             
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                              
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The Chief Clerk notified the Senate.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The bill was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.