Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2022-04-25 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2022-04-25 House Journal Page 2628 HB 291 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 291 "An Act extending the termination date of the Council on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page STA RPT CS(STA) NEW TITLE 4DP 1DNP 1NR 1AM 2129 FN1: (DPS) 2129 FIN RPT CS(STA) NEW TITLE 6DP 1NR 2578 FN1: (DPS) 2578 Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 291(STA) "An Act relating to the Council on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault; extending the termination date of the Council on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault; and providing for an effective date." There was objection. The question being: "Shall the House adopt CSHB 291(STA)?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2022-04-25 House Journal Page 2629 HB 291 Second Reading Adopt State Affairs CS YEAS: 32 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillham, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Rasmussen, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Eastman, Kurka, Rauscher, Tilton, Vance Excused: Patkotak, Prax And so, CSHB 291(STA) was adopted. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 1, line 7: Delete "five" Insert "six" Page 1, line 8, following "area": Insert ", one of whom shall be a member of a faith-based organization that provides services to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault," Page 2, following line 18: Insert "(2) "faith-based organization" means an organization or legal entity that acknowledges a religious belief or purpose in its governing documents or mission statement;" Page 2, line 19: Delete "(2)" Insert "(3)" Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Tarr objected. 2022-04-25 House Journal Page 2630 Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Carpenter: Page 1, line 6 of the amendment: Delete "one" Insert "two" Representative Carpenter moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Spohnholz objected. Representative Johnson rose to a point of order, citing Section 61 of Mason's Manual, regarding confining remarks to the amendment. The Speaker cautioned the member to confine remarks to the amendment before the body. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 291(STA) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Patkotak, Prax And so, Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 291(STA) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 2022-04-25 House Journal Page 2631 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Patkotak, Prax And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 1, line 7, following "governor,": Insert "and subject to confirmation by the legislature in joint session," Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Tuck objected. The Speaker ruled Amendment No. 2 out of order. Representative Eastman appealed the ruling of the Chair. The question being: "Shall the Ruling of the Chair be sustained?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 291(STA) Sustain the Ruling of the Chair Amendment No. 2/Ruled Out of Order YEAS: 22 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, McCabe, Merrick, Ortiz, Rasmussen, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Vance 2022-04-25 House Journal Page 2632 Excused: Patkotak, Prax And so, Amendment No. 2 was ruled out of order. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative McCarty: Page 2, lines 9-12 after "corrections": Delete all material. Insert "." Representative McCarty moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Tarr objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 291(STA) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Ortiz, Rasmussen, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Patkotak, Prax And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative McCarty: Page 2, line 24: Delete "2028" Insert "2026" 2022-04-25 House Journal Page 2633 Representative McCarty moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Tarr objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 291(STA) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Kurka, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Rauscher, Shaw, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Merrick, Ortiz, Rasmussen, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Patkotak, Prax And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. The Speaker stated that, without objection, the House would recess to 3:30 p.m.; and so, the House recessed at 1:33 p.m.