Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2022-05-09 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2022-05-09 House Journal Page 2817 HB 177 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 177 "An Act relating to an increase of an appropriation due to additional federal or other program receipts; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page STA RPT CS(STA) 5DP 1183 FN1: ZERO(GOV) 1183 FIN RPT CS(STA) 4DP 4NR 2040 FN2: ZERO(GOV) 2040 Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 177(STA) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 2, lines 15 - 19: Delete "shall again review the revised program or project, and, if the governor determines to authorize the expenditure, the governor shall provide the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee with a statement of the governor's reasons before commencement of expenditures under the revised program or project" Insert "may not expend the receipts under the revised program or project unless the receipts are specifically appropriated by the full legislature [SHALL AGAIN REVIEW THE REVISED PROGRAM AND IF THE GOVERNOR DETERMINES TO AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE, THE GOVERNOR SHALL PROVIDE THE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET AND AUDIT 2022-05-09 House Journal Page 2818 COMMITTEE WITH A STATEMENT OF THE GOVERNOR'S REASONS BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF EXPENDITURES UNDER THE REVISED PROGRAM]." Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Tuck objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 177(STA) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman, Kurka, McKay, Prax, Rauscher, Shaw, Tarr, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCabe, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Patkotak, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Thompson, Tuck, Zulkosky Excused: McCarty, Rasmussen, Wool And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 177(STA) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 177(STA) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 177(STA) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 177(STA) Third Reading Final Passage 2022-05-09 House Journal Page 2819 YEAS: 36 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillham, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Patkotak, Prax, Rauscher, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman Excused: McCarty, Rasmussen, Wool And so, CSHB 177(STA) passed the House. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 177(STA) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.