Legislature(2019 - 2020)
2019-05-08 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2019-05-08 House Journal Page 0939 HB 49 Representative Pruitt gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 49(FIN) am (page 934). Representative Pruitt moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of CSHB 49(FIN) am be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The following was before the House in third reading: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 49(FIN) am "An Act relating to criminal law and procedure; relating to pretrial services; establishing the crime of possession of motor vehicle theft tools; relating to electronic monitoring; relating to controlled substances; relating to probation and parole; relating to sentencing; amending the definitions of 'most serious felony,' 'sex offense,' and 'sex offender'; relating to registration of sex offenders; relating to operating under the influence; relating to refusal to submit to a chemical test; relating to the duties of the commissioner of corrections; relating to testing of sexual assault examination kits; relating to reports of involuntary commitment; amending Rules 6(r)(6) and 38.2, Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure; and providing for an effective date." 2019-05-08 House Journal Page 0940 The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSHB 49(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 49(FIN) am Third Reading Final Passage Reconsideration YEAS: 24 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, LeDoux, Lincoln, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Hopkins, Jackson, Johnson, Merrick, Pruitt, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Revak, Shaw, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tilton, Vance Excused: Neuman, Tuck And so, CSHB 49(FIN) am passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Thompson moved the court rule changes. The question being: "Shall the court rule changes be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 49(FIN) am Third Reading Court Rule Changes Reconsideration YEAS: 34 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Jackson, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, LeDoux, Lincoln, Merrick, Ortiz, Pruitt, Rasmussen, Revak, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Eastman, Rauscher, Vance Excused: Neuman, Tuck And so, the court rule changes were adopted. 2019-05-08 House Journal Page 0941 Representative Thompson moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 49(FIN) am Third Reading Effective Date Reconsideration YEAS: 38 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Jackson, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, LeDoux, Lincoln, Merrick, Ortiz, Pruitt, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Revak, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Vance, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Neuman, Tuck And so, the effective date clause was adopted. CSHB 49(FIN) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.