Legislature(2019 - 2020)
2019-07-24 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2019-07-24 House Journal Page 1309 HB 2001 The following, which was not taken up on the July 23 calendar (page 1304), was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 2001 "An Act making a special appropriation from the earnings reserve account for the payment of permanent fund dividends; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 7DP 3AM 1299 Representative Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: 2019-07-24 House Journal Page 1310 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2001(FIN) "An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government and for certain programs; capitalizing funds; making supplemental appropriations, reappropriations, and other appropriations; making appropriations for the operating and capital expenses of the state's integrated comprehensive mental health program; and providing for an effective date." Representative Eastman objected. The question being: "Shall CSHB 2001(FIN) be adopted in lieu of the original bill?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 2001 Second Reading Adopt Finance CS YEAS: 19 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 11 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, LeBon, Lincoln, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Johnson, LeDoux, Pruitt, Revak, Shaw, Sullivan-Leonard, Tilton, Vance, Wilson Excused: Carpenter, Claman, Fields, Jackson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Neuman, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Talerico, Tuck And so, CSHB 2001(FIN) was adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Foster: Page 17, line 28, through page 18, line 3: Delete all material. Reletter the following subsection accordingly. Page 19, line 28: Delete "(f) - (h)" Insert "(f)" 2019-07-24 House Journal Page 1311 Representative Foster moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Vance objected. Representative Tarr rose to a point of order regarding impugning motives. The Speaker cautioned the member. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 2001(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 11 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, LeBon, Lincoln, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Johnson, LeDoux, Pruitt, Revak, Shaw, Sullivan-Leonard, Tilton, Vance, Wilson Excused: Carpenter, Claman, Fields, Jackson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Neuman, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Talerico, Tuck And so, Amendment No. 3 was adopted. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Stutes, Ortiz, Story, and Drummond: Page 7, following line 24: Insert new material to read: "Marine Highway System" Under Appropriation Items: Insert "5,000,000" Under General Funds: Insert "5,000,000" 2019-07-24 House Journal Page 1312 "Marine Vessel Operations" Under Allocations: Insert "5,000,000" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Stutes moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Eastman objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 2001(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 22 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 11 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, LeBon, LeDoux, Lincoln, Ortiz, Revak, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Johnson, Pruitt, Sullivan-Leonard, Tilton, Vance, Wilson Excused: Carpenter, Claman, Fields, Jackson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Neuman, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Talerico, Tuck And so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. **The presence of Representatives Fields and Tuck, who were excused (page 1307), was noted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representatives Vance, Eastman, Jackson, Wilson, Tilton, Johnson, LeDoux, Sullivan-Leonard, and Tuck: Page 17, line 28, through page 18, line 3: Delete all material and insert: "(f) The amount authorized under AS 37.13.145(b) for transfer by the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation on June 30, 2019, estimated 2019-07-24 House Journal Page 1313 to be $1,944,000,000, is appropriated from the earnings reserve account (AS 37.13.145) to the dividend fund (AS 43.23.045(a)) for the payment of permanent fund dividends and for administrative and associated costs for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020." Reletter the following subsection accordingly. Page 19, line 28: Delete "and (f) - (h)" Insert "(f), and (g)" Representative Vance moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Fields objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 2001(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 9 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Eastman, Johnson, LeDoux, Pruitt, Revak, Shaw, Sullivan-Leonard, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wilson Nays: Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, LeBon, Lincoln, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Carpenter, Claman, Jackson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Neuman, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Talerico And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Representative Wilson requested that the Speaker direct the Chief Clerk to remove the short title from the voting board since the permanent fund dividend is no longer in the bill (See Amendment No. 3). There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2019-07-24 House Journal Page 1314 Representative Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 2001(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 2001(FIN) am was read the third time. Representatives LeDoux, Tilton, and Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and they were required to vote. The question being: "Shall CSHB 2001(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 2001(FIN) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 21 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 9 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, LeBon, Lincoln, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Johnson, LeDoux, Pruitt, Revak, Shaw, Sullivan-Leonard, Tilton, Vance, Wilson Excused: Carpenter, Claman, Jackson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Neuman, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Talerico And so, CSHB 2001(FIN) am passed the House. Representative Thompson moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 2001(FIN) am Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 29 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 9 ABSENT: 0 2019-07-24 House Journal Page 1315 Yeas: Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, LeBon, LeDoux, Lincoln, Ortiz, Pruitt, Revak, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Vance Excused: Carpenter, Claman, Jackson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Neuman, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Talerico And so, the effective date clause was adopted. CSHB 2001(FIN) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.