Legislature(2019 - 2020)
2020-02-10 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20115
Full Journal pdf2020-02-10 House Journal Page 1576 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 115(efd am) Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 1 NAYS: 37 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 VACANT: 1 Yeas: Eastman Nays: Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillis, Hannan, Hopkins, Jackson, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Lincoln, Merrick, Neuman, Ortiz, Pruitt, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: LeDoux Vacant: District 3 And so, Amendment No. 8 was not adopted. Amendment No. 9 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 1, lines 4 - 7: Delete all material and insert: "(m) An absentee ballot application must include an option for a qualified voter to choose to receive absentee ballots by mail for future regularly scheduled state elections. The division shall stop sending absentee ballots to a voter under this subsection upon the voter's written request. A voter may request that the division stop sending absentee ballots at any time. If a voter does not request that the division stop sending absentee ballots, the division may stop sending absentee ballots to the voter and require the voter to reapply only if" Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 9 be adopted. Representative Tuck objected.