Legislature(2019 - 2020)
2020-02-10 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20115
Full Journal pdf2020-02-10 House Journal Page 1571 (3) any combination of future elections described in (2)(A) - (C) of this subsection. (n) The division may not require a voter who chooses to receive absentee ballots under this section to reapply to receive absentee ballots by mail unless the voter has not voted an absentee ballot for a period of four years or an absentee ballot sent to the voter under this section is returned to the division as undeliverable. A voter may change the voter's absentee ballot selection under (m) of this section by reapplying under this section." Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Tuck objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 115(efd am) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 3 NAYS: 35 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 VACANT: 1 Yeas: Eastman, Jackson, Vance Nays: Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillis, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Lincoln, Merrick, Neuman, Ortiz, Pruitt, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: LeDoux Vacant: District 3 And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Eastman: