2018-03-21                     House Journal                      Page 2823
Excused:  Neuman                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
And so, Amendment No. 63 was not adopted.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
The Speaker stated that, without objection, Amendment Nos. 64 and                                                               
65 would be moved to the bottom of the amendments.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Amendment No. 66 was offered  by Representatives Eastman and                                                                     
Rauscher:                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Page 53, following line 6:                                                                                                      
     Insert a new subsection to read:                                                                                           
     "(c)  It is the intent of the legislature that no state funds be used to                                                   
promote the creation or expansion of a borough where one does not                                                               
already exist unless the residents in the affected jurisdiction have                                                            
expressed the desire to reside in a borough through a public vote on                                                            
the matter."                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                   
Amendment No. 66 be adopted.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Guttenberg objected.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 66 be adopted?"  The roll                                                             
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 286(FIN) am                                                                                                                
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 66                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  9   NAYS:  30   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Parish, Rauscher, Talerico,                                                                  
Thompson, Tilton, Wilson                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Birch, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn,                                                                    
Guttenberg, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp,                                                                   
Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Millett, Ortiz, Pruitt, Reinbold,                                                              
Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Tarr, Tuck,                                                               
Wool, Zulkosky                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Neuman                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
And so, Amendment No. 66 was not adopted.