2018-04-30                     House Journal                      Page 3503
The question being:  "Shall the House concur in the Senate                                                                      
amendment?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSHB 170(L&C)                                                                                                               
Concur                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  33   NAYS:  4   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  1                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Birch, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn,                                                                    
Guttenberg, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kopp,                                                                          
Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Pruitt,                                                                
Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard,                                                                 
Talerico, Tarr, Tilton, Tuck, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Eastman, Johnson, Parish, Rauscher                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Knopp, Thompson                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Absent:  Chenault                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting                                                              
SCS CSHB 170(L&C).                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll                                                             
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court                                                        
rule changes.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll                                                             
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                              
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The Chief Clerk notified the Senate.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The bill was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
HJR 21                                                                                                                        
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                                  
House consider the Senate message (page 3371) on the following:                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
    SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION                                                                               
    NO. 21                                                                                                                      
    Urging the federal government to respect the authority of the state                                                         
    to regulate marijuana use, production, and distribution and to