Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2018-04-30 House JournalFull Journal pdf
2018-04-30 House Journal Page 3502 HB 170 Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message (page 3436) on the following: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 170(JUD) "An Act relating to securities, registration, exempt securities, exempt transactions, broker-dealers, agents, investment advice, investment advisers, investment adviser representatives, federal covered securities, federal covered investment advisers, viatical settlement interests, small intrastate security offerings, Canadian broker-dealers, and Canadian agents; relating to protecting older and vulnerable adults from financial exploitation; relating to administrative, civil, and criminal enforcement provisions, including restitution and civil penalties for violations; relating to an investor training fund; establishing increased civil penalties for harming older persons and vulnerable adults; relating to corporations organized under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act; amending Rules 4, 5, 54, 65, and 90, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 602, Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure; and providing for an effective date." and SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 170(L&C) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Tuck moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment and recommended that the members vote yes. 2018-04-30 House Journal Page 3503 The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 170(L&C) Concur YEAS: 33 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Birch, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Tilton, Tuck, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Johnson, Parish, Rauscher Excused: Knopp, Thompson Absent: Chenault And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting SCS CSHB 170(L&C). Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule changes. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. The bill was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.