2013-03-28                     Senate Journal                      Page 0841
Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 8 :                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Page 36, line 16:                                                                                                               
     Delete "116,992,800"                                                                                                     
     Insert "116,620,800"                                                                                                     
     Delete "6,344,400"                                                                                                       
     Insert "5,972,400"                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Page 37, line 18:                                                                                                               
     Delete "1,795,300"                                                                                                         
     Insert "1,423,300"                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 8. Senator                                                                
Coghill objected.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll                                                                
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSHB 65(FIN)                                                                                                                
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 8                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  4   NAYS:  15   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Ellis, French, Hoffman, Wielechowski                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Fairclough, Giessel,                                                             
Huggins, Kelly, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Gardner                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
and so, Amendment No. 8 failed.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 65(FIN) was                                                                                 
automatically in third reading.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Senator Wielechowski moved that the bill be returned to second                                                                  
reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being                                                                     
Amendment No. 9. Without objection, the bill was returned to second                                                             
reading.