Legislature(2013 - 2014)
2013-03-14 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20%2065
Full Journal pdf2013-03-14 House Journal Page 0531 Representative Kreiss-Tomkins moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 8 be adopted. There was objection. Representative Kreiss-Tomkins moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 8. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 9 was offered by Representatives Kawasaki, Kerttula, Gara, Josephson, and Kreiss-Tomkins: Page 61, line 19: Delete "$3,000,000" Insert "$5,000,000" Representative Kawasaki moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 9 be adopted. Representative Thompson objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 9 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 65(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 30 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Drummond, Gara, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tarr Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Gattis, Gruenberg, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Foster, Guttenberg, Millett And so, Amendment No. 9 was not adopted.