Legislature(2013 - 2014)
2013-04-13 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20%2052
Full Journal pdf2013-04-13 House Journal Page 1162 Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that she be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Kerttula was required to vote. Representative Pruitt moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment to HB 52 am, thus adopting SCS HB 52(FIN), and recommended that the members vote yes. The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment to HB 52 am?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS HB 52(FIN) Concur YEAS: 36 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Drummond, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Gruenberg, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Josephson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kerttula, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Guttenberg, Nageak Absent: Gara, Tarr And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment. Representative Pruitt moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. SCS HB 52(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment. MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE HB 71 A message dated April 12, 2013, was read stating the Senate passed: