2010-04-18                     House Journal                      Page 2541
Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, Lynn, Millett,                                                               
Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Ramras, Salmon, Seaton, Thomas,                                                                 
Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Absent:  Stoltze                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                              
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                         
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The Chief Clerk notified the Senate.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSHB 10(FIN) am S(reengrossed) was referred to the Chief                                                                    
Clerk for enrollment.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
                        SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SCR 5                                                                                                                         
Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                              
following be taken up as a Special Order of Business:                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 5                                                                                         
     Suspending Rules 24(c), 35, 41(b), and 42(e), Uniform Rules of                                                             
     the Alaska State Legislature, concerning House Bill No. 10,                                                                
     authorizing a borough to charge a city for costs of collecting                                                             
     certain taxes; relating to a mandatory exemption from municipal                                                            
     property taxes for residences of certain widows or widowers, and                                                           
     to optional exemptions from municipal property taxes for property                                                          
     of certain fraternal organizations, for certain college property, and                                                      
     for certain residential property.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall SCR 5 pass the House?"  The roll was                                                                
taken with the following result: