Legislature(2009 - 2010)
2009-04-19 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2009-04-19 House Journal Page 1151 HB 102 Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message (page 1097) on the following: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 102(JUD) "An Act relating to the Uniform Commercial Code, to the general provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, to documents of title under the Uniform Commercial Code, to the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, to lease-purchases of personal property, to the contractual duty to act fairly and in good faith, and to carrier, warehouse, and animal care liens; amending Rules 403 and 902, Alaska Rules of Evidence; and providing for an effective date." and 2009-04-19 House Journal Page 1152 SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 102(JUD) "An Act relating to the Uniform Commercial Code, to the general provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, to documents of title under the Uniform Commercial Code, to the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, to lease-purchases of personal property, to the contractual duty to act fairly and in good faith, and to carrier, warehouse, and livestock care liens; amending Rules 403 and 902, Alaska Rules of Evidence; and providing for an effective date." (SCR 9 - title change resolution) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Johansen moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 102(JUD), thus adopting SCS CSHB 102(JUD), and recommended that the members vote yes. The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 102(JUD)?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 102(JUD) Concur YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Ramras, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Tuck, Wilson And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule changes. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2009-04-19 House Journal Page 1153 The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. SCS CSHB 102(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.