Legislature(2009 - 2010)
2009-03-23 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2009-03-23 House Journal Page 0560 HB 102 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 102 "An Act relating to the Uniform Commercial Code, to the general provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, to documents of title under the Uniform Commercial Code, to the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, and to lease-purchases of personal property; amending Rules 403 and 902, Alaska Rules of Evidence; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page L&C RPT 5NR 259 FN1: ZERO(CED) 260 2009-03-23 House Journal Page 0561 JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 3DP 4NR 496 FN1: ZERO(CED) 497 Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 102(JUD) "An Act relating to the Uniform Commercial Code, to the general provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, to documents of title under the Uniform Commercial Code, to the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, to lease-purchases of personal property, to the contractual duty to act fairly and in good faith, and to carrier, warehouse, and animal care liens; amending Rules 403 and 902, Alaska Rules of Evidence; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 102(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 102(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 102(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 102(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 30 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 10 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Doogan, Fairclough, Foster, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, Lynn, Munoz, Olson, Petersen, Ramras, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Tuck, Wilson Excused: Crawford, Dahlstrom, Edgmon, Gara, Hawker, Herron, Kawasaki, Millett, Neuman, Salmon And so, CSHB 102(JUD) passed the House. 2009-03-23 House Journal Page 0562 Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule changes. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 102(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.