Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2006-02-17 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2006-02-17 Senate Journal Page 2230 HB 81 Message dated February 16 was read, stating pursuant to the Senate request, the House has returned 2006-02-17 Senate Journal Page 2231 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 81(L&C) and SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 81(JUD) "An Act establishing an administrative fine and procedure for construction contractors in certain circumstances; increasing the amount of a civil penalty for persons acting in the capacity of contractors or home inspectors; modifying the elements of a crime involving contractor registration and residential contractors; modifying the exemptions from regulation under AS 08.18 for contractors; and exempting the administrative hearings for imposing an administrative fine on construction contractors from the hearings conducted by the office of administrative hearings in the Department of Administration." Senator Wagoner, Acting Majority Leader, moved that the Senate rescind its previous action in passing SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 81(JUD). The question being: "Shall the Senate rescind its previous action?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 81(JUD) Rescind action in passing? YEAS: 14 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Elton, French, Green, Guess, Huggins, Kookesh, Olson, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Wagoner Excused: Davis, Ellis, Hoffman, Stevens G, Therriault, Wilken and so, the Senate rescinded its previous action. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 81(JUD) was before the Senate in third reading. 2006-02-17 Senate Journal Page 2232 Senator Huggins moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 1. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Huggins offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 3, line 11, following "A contractor": Insert ", home inspector," Page 3, line 12, following "a contractor": Insert "or home inspector" Page 3, line 19, following "(b) A contractor": Insert ", home inspector," Page 3, line 19, following "capacity of a contractor": Insert "or home inspector" Senator Huggins moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Elton objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 81(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Elton, French, Green, Guess, Huggins, Kookesh, Olson, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Wagoner Nays: Dyson Excused: Davis, Ellis, Hoffman, Stevens G, Therriault, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 81(JUD) am S was automatically in third reading on final passage. 2006-02-17 Senate Journal Page 2233 The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 81(JUD) am S "An Act establishing an administrative fine and procedure for construction contractors in certain circumstances; increasing the amount of a civil penalty for persons acting in the capacity of contractors or home inspectors; modifying the elements of a crime involving contractor registration and residential contractors; modifying the exemptions from regulation under AS 08.18 for contractors; and exempting the administrative hearings for imposing an administrative fine on construction contractors from the hearings conducted by the office of administrative hearings in the Department of Administration" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 81(JUD) am S Third Reading - Final Passage YEAS: 13 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Elton, French, Green, Guess, Huggins, Kookesh, Olson, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Wagoner Nays: Dyson Excused: Davis, Ellis, Hoffman, Stevens G, Therriault, Wilken and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 81(JUD) am S passed the Senate and was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.