Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2006-05-08 House Journal
No results found showing results without SB%20169
Full Journal pdf2006-05-08 House Journal Page 3873 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses, Salmon Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall SB 271 pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 271--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 36 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson Nays: Cissna, Gara, Guttenberg, Kerttula And so, SB 271 passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. SB 271 was signed by the Speaker and Chief Clerk and returned to the Senate. SB 169 Representative McGuire brought up reconsideration of the vote on HCS CSSB 169(FIN) am H (page 3820). The following was again before the House in third reading: