Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2005-05-08 House Journal
No results found showing results without SB%20102
Full Journal pdf2005-05-08 House Journal Page 1779 Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stoltze, Thomas And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 12, lines 28 - 29: Delete "or address any matter regulated by the Department of Environmental Conservation" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Samuels objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 102(RES) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Elkins, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Salmon, Seaton, Wilson Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 102(RES) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage.