Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2005-04-29 House Journal
No results found showing results without HCR%2010
Full Journal pdf2005-04-29 House Journal Page 1385 The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 187(FIN)--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 24 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Coghill, Elkins, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kelly, Kerttula, Kohring, Neuman, Salmon Excused: Chenault, Cissna, Stoltze And so, lacking the necessary 27 votes, the effective date clause was not adopted, and the new title follows: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 187(FIN)(efd fld) "An Act relating to money deposited into the Alaska permanent fund as a result of the settlement of State v. Amerada Hess; relating to the Alaska capital income fund and to deposits of income from State v. Amerada Hess settlement money into the Alaska capital income fund." CSHB 187(FIN)(efd fld) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment. CONSIDERATION OF THE DAILY CALENDAR (continued) SECOND READING OF HOUSE RESOLUTIONS HCR 10 The following was read the second time: HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 10 Supporting the development of the Kensington Gold Mine.