2005-05-10                     House Journal                      Page 1936
The question being:  "Shall the House concur in the Senate                                          
amendment to CSHB 33(FIN)?"  The roll was taken with the                                            
following result:                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
SCS CSHB 33(FIN)                                                                                    
Concur                                                                                              
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  38   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  2                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford,                                    
Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg,                                  
Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring,                                
Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson,                                           
Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas,                                         
Wilson                                                                                              
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Kelly, Weyhrauch                                                                           
                                                                                                    
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting                                  
SCS CSHB 33(FIN).                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                
                                                                                                    
The Chief Clerk notified the Senate.                                                                
                                                                                                    
SCS CSHB 33(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.                                    
                                                                                                    
HB 161                                                                                            
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
House consider the Senate message (page 1927) on the following:                                     
                                                                                                    
     CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 161(STA) am                                                              
     "An Act relating to reemployment of and benefits for or on behalf                              
     of retired teachers and public employees and to teachers or                                    
     employees who participated in retirement incentive programs and                                
     are subsequently reemployed as a commissioner; repealing secs. 5,                              
     7, and 9, ch. 58, SLA 2001; providing for an effective date by                                 
     amending the delayed effective date for secs. 3, 5, 9, and 12, ch.                             
     57, SLA 2001, and repealing sec. 13, ch. 58, SLA 2001, which is                                
     the delayed effective date for secs. 5, 7, and 9, ch. 58, SLA 2001;                            
     and providing for an effective date."